Mapping Pluto's Republic: Cognitive and Epistemological Reflections on Philosophy of Pseudoscience: Reconsidering the Demarcation Problem
The presence of fringe and debatable methods and theories is widespread in the academia, excluding practically no discipline. Since theoretical reliability, epistemic warrant and empirical support are contentious issues, the demarcation between science and pseudoscience remains highly controversial,...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Contributors: | ; |
Format: | Electronic Review |
Language: | English |
Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
Journals Online & Print: | |
Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
Published: |
Equinox Publ.
[2015]
|
In: |
Journal for the cognitive science of religion
Year: 2015, Volume: 3, Issue: 2, Pages: 183-205 |
Standardized Subjects / Keyword chains: | B
Science
/ Pseudo-science
/ Distinction
/ History of religion studies (Subject)
/ Kognitive Religionswissenschaft
|
RelBib Classification: | AA Study of religion AE Psychology of religion VA Philosophy |
Further subjects: | B
Cognitive Science
B Critical Thinking B super-natural / paranormal B Book review B philosophy of science B Pseudoscience B Demarcation |
Online Access: |
Volltext (Resolving-System) Volltext (doi) |
MARC
LEADER | 00000caa a22000002 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | 169414514X | ||
003 | DE-627 | ||
005 | 20231113155741.0 | ||
007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
008 | 200406s2015 xx |||||oo 00| ||eng c | ||
024 | 7 | |a 10.1558/jcsr.27091 |2 doi | |
035 | |a (DE-627)169414514X | ||
035 | |a (DE-599)KXP169414514X | ||
040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rda | ||
041 | |a eng | ||
084 | |a 0 |2 ssgn | ||
100 | 1 | |e VerfasserIn |0 (DE-588)1076044395 |0 (DE-627)834213478 |0 (DE-576)398252939 |4 aut |a Ambasciano, Leonardo | |
109 | |a Ambasciano, Leonardo | ||
245 | 1 | 0 | |a Mapping Pluto's Republic |b Cognitive and Epistemological Reflections on Philosophy of Pseudoscience: Reconsidering the Demarcation Problem |
264 | 1 | |c [2015] | |
336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
520 | |a The presence of fringe and debatable methods and theories is widespread in the academia, excluding practically no discipline. Since theoretical reliability, epistemic warrant and empirical support are contentious issues, the demarcation between science and pseudoscience remains highly controversial, especially in the Humanities. However, a renewed interest in the demarcation problem holds much promise to tackle the underlying methodological and epistemological questions. This review essay briefly deals with the historiographical resilience of pseudoscience and the fascination which psi phenomena in the academic history of religion in the light of Massimo Pigliucci and Maarten Boudry's recently co-edited book, entitled Philosophy of Pseudoscience: Reconsidering the Demarcation Problem (Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press, 2013). A detailed review of Pigliucci and Boudry's volume is also provided. | ||
601 | |a Philosophie | ||
601 | |a Problem | ||
650 | 4 | |a Cognitive Science | |
650 | 4 | |a Critical Thinking | |
650 | 4 | |a Demarcation | |
650 | 4 | |a paranormal/super-natural | |
650 | 4 | |a philosophy of science | |
650 | 4 | |a Pseudoscience | |
652 | |a AA:AE:VA | ||
655 | 7 | |a Rezension |0 (DE-588)4049712-4 |0 (DE-627)106186019 |0 (DE-576)209083166 |2 gnd-content | |
689 | 0 | 0 | |d s |0 (DE-588)4066562-8 |0 (DE-627)104393998 |0 (DE-576)209165138 |2 gnd |a Wissenschaft |
689 | 0 | 1 | |d s |0 (DE-588)4278343-4 |0 (DE-627)104410647 |0 (DE-576)210734876 |2 gnd |a Pseudowissenschaft |
689 | 0 | 2 | |d s |0 (DE-588)4187095-5 |0 (DE-627)105274798 |0 (DE-576)210043555 |2 gnd |a Unterscheidung |
689 | 0 | 3 | |d s |0 (DE-588)4177739-6 |0 (DE-627)104674296 |0 (DE-576)209979801 |2 gnd |a Religionsgeschichte |g Fach |
689 | 0 | 4 | |d s |0 (DE-588)1153645505 |0 (DE-627)1015151884 |0 (DE-576)500375216 |2 gnd |a Kognitive Religionswissenschaft |
689 | 0 | |5 (DE-627) | |
700 | 1 | |e VerfasserIn des Bezugswerks |0 (DE-588)13235053X |0 (DE-627)521535832 |0 (DE-576)179162276 |4 ant |a Pigliucci, Massimo |d 1964- | |
700 | 1 | |a Boudry, Maarten |e VerfasserIn des Bezugswerks |4 ant | |
773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Journal for the cognitive science of religion |d Sheffield : Equinox Publ., 2013 |g 3(2015), 2, Seite 183-205 |h Online-Ressource |w (DE-627)731338804 |w (DE-600)2693637-9 |w (DE-576)377157910 |x 2049-7563 |7 nnns |
773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:3 |g year:2015 |g number:2 |g pages:183-205 |
856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://www.equinoxpub.com/journals/index.php/JCSR/article/view/27091 |x Resolving-System |
856 | |u https://doi.org/10.1558/jcsr.27091 |x doi |3 Volltext | ||
951 | |a AR | ||
ELC | |a 1 | ||
ITA | |a 1 |t 1 | ||
LOK | |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 | ||
LOK | |0 001 3619424101 | ||
LOK | |0 003 DE-627 | ||
LOK | |0 004 169414514X | ||
LOK | |0 005 20230622104324 | ||
LOK | |0 008 200406||||||||||||||||ger||||||| | ||
LOK | |0 040 |a DE-Tue135 |c DE-627 |d DE-Tue135 | ||
LOK | |0 092 |o n | ||
LOK | |0 852 |a DE-Tue135 | ||
LOK | |0 852 1 |9 00 | ||
LOK | |0 935 |a ixzs |a ixzo |a rwrk | ||
LOK | |0 936ln |0 1442042966 |a AA | ||
LOK | |0 936ln |0 1442043024 |a AE | ||
LOK | |0 936ln |0 1442053844 |a VA | ||
ORI | |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw | ||
REL | |a 1 | ||
STA | 0 | 0 | |a Distinction,Discrimination,Pseudo-science,Science,Science,Science in art |
STB | 0 | 0 | |a Distinction,Pseudoscience,Science,Science |
STC | 0 | 0 | |a Ciencia,Ciencia,Ciencias,Distinción,Pseudo-ciencia |
STD | 0 | 0 | |a Distinzione,Discernimento,Discernimento,Pseudoscienza,Scienza <motivo>,Scienza,Sapere,Sapere,Sapere (motivo),Sapere |
STE | 0 | 0 | |a 区别,分别,科学,科学,学科,学科 |
STF | 0 | 0 | |a 伪科学,區別,分別,科學,科學,學科,學科 |
STG | 0 | 0 | |a Ciência,Ciência,Distinção,Pseudo-ciência |
STH | 0 | 0 | |a Наука (мотив),Наука,Псевдонаука,Распознавание,Дифференциация (философия) |
STI | 0 | 0 | |a Διάκριση,Επιστήμη (μοτίβο),Επιστήμη,Ψευδοεπιστήμη |
SUB | |a REL | ||
SYG | 0 | 0 | |a Wissenschaften,Science,Bürgerliche Wissenschaft,Wissenschaften , Distinktion , Cognitive science of religion |