What makes Critical Religion critical? A response to Russell McCutcheon
This is a response to Russell McCutcheon's (2018) book chapter titled "On Concepts and Entities: Varieties of Critical Scholarship" in which he criticizes the value-driven approached advocated in previous editorials of Critical Research on Religion. This response points out that criti...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Electronic Article |
Language: | English |
Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
Journals Online & Print: | |
Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
Published: |
Sage
[2020]
|
In: |
Critical research on religion
Year: 2020, Volume: 8, Issue: 1, Pages: 73-86 |
Standardized Subjects / Keyword chains: | B
McCutcheon, Russell T. 1961-
/ Science of Religion
/ Critique of religion
|
RelBib Classification: | AA Study of religion AB Philosophy of religion; criticism of religion; atheism |
Further subjects: | B
critique of religion
B critical religion B Critical Research on Religion B Russell McCutcheon |
Online Access: |
Presumably Free Access Volltext (Verlag) |
Summary: | This is a response to Russell McCutcheon's (2018) book chapter titled "On Concepts and Entities: Varieties of Critical Scholarship" in which he criticizes the value-driven approached advocated in previous editorials of Critical Research on Religion. This response points out that critical religion (the approach of McCutcheon and others) is also value-driven and not non-normative as he claims, but that this is what makes it critical. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 2050-3040 |
Contains: | Enthalten in: Critical research on religion
|
Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1177/2050303220911149 |