What makes Critical Religion critical? A response to Russell McCutcheon
This is a response to Russell McCutcheon's (2018) book chapter titled "On Concepts and Entities: Varieties of Critical Scholarship" in which he criticizes the value-driven approached advocated in previous editorials of Critical Research on Religion. This response points out that criti...
1. VerfasserIn: | |
---|---|
Medienart: | Elektronisch Aufsatz |
Sprache: | Englisch |
Verfügbarkeit prüfen: | HBZ Gateway |
Journals Online & Print: | |
Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
Veröffentlicht: |
Sage
[2020]
|
In: |
Critical research on religion
Jahr: 2020, Band: 8, Heft: 1, Seiten: 73-86 |
normierte Schlagwort(-folgen): | B
McCutcheon, Russell T. 1961-
/ Religionswissenschaft
/ Religionskritik
|
RelBib Classification: | AA Religionswissenschaft AB Religionsphilosophie; Religionskritik; Atheismus |
weitere Schlagwörter: | B
critique of religion
B critical religion B Critical Research on Religion B Russell McCutcheon |
Online Zugang: |
Vermutlich kostenfreier Zugang Volltext (Verlag) |
Zusammenfassung: | This is a response to Russell McCutcheon's (2018) book chapter titled "On Concepts and Entities: Varieties of Critical Scholarship" in which he criticizes the value-driven approached advocated in previous editorials of Critical Research on Religion. This response points out that critical religion (the approach of McCutcheon and others) is also value-driven and not non-normative as he claims, but that this is what makes it critical. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 2050-3040 |
Enthält: | Enthalten in: Critical research on religion
|
Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1177/2050303220911149 |