What makes Critical Religion critical? A response to Russell McCutcheon
This is a response to Russell McCutcheon's (2018) book chapter titled "On Concepts and Entities: Varieties of Critical Scholarship" in which he criticizes the value-driven approached advocated in previous editorials of Critical Research on Religion. This response points out that criti...
| Publié dans: | Critical research on religion |
|---|---|
| Auteur principal: | |
| Type de support: | Électronique Article |
| Langue: | Anglais |
| Vérifier la disponibilité: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | En cours de chargement...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Publié: |
Sage
[2020]
|
| Dans: |
Critical research on religion
|
| Sujets / Chaînes de mots-clés standardisés: | B
McCutcheon, Russell T. 1961-
/ Science des religions
/ Critique de la religion
|
| RelBib Classification: | AA Sciences des religions AB Philosophie de la religion |
| Sujets non-standardisés: | B
critique of religion
B critical religion B Critical Research on Religion B Russell McCutcheon |
| Accès en ligne: |
Accès probablement gratuit Volltext (Verlag) |
| Résumé: | This is a response to Russell McCutcheon's (2018) book chapter titled "On Concepts and Entities: Varieties of Critical Scholarship" in which he criticizes the value-driven approached advocated in previous editorials of Critical Research on Religion. This response points out that critical religion (the approach of McCutcheon and others) is also value-driven and not non-normative as he claims, but that this is what makes it critical. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 2050-3040 |
| Contient: | Enthalten in: Critical research on religion
|
| Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1177/2050303220911149 |