Organic Unities and the Problem of Evil: A Reply to Lemos
Chapter 9 constitutes a critical examination of Noah Lemos's contribution to this volume (see Chapter 8). It addresses Lemos's defense of G. E. Moore's principle of organic unities against three objections. The first objection concerns what is involved in contributing to the intrinsic...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Print Article |
| Language: | English |
| Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Published: |
University Press
[2019]
|
| In: |
Oxford studies in philosophy of religion
Year: 2019, Volume: 9, Pages: 183-194 |
| Standardized Subjects / Keyword chains: | B
Evil
|
| RelBib Classification: | AB Philosophy of religion; criticism of religion; atheism NCA Ethics |
MARC
| LEADER | 00000caa a2200000 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | 1695015525 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20200630153735.0 | ||
| 007 | tu | ||
| 008 | 200420s2019 xx ||||| 00| ||eng c | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-627)1695015525 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)KXP1695015525 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rda | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 084 | |a 0 |a 1 |2 ssgn | ||
| 100 | 1 | |e VerfasserIn |0 (DE-588)142953601 |0 (DE-627)70435053X |0 (DE-576)163671966 |4 aut |a Zimmerman, Michael J. |d 1951- | |
| 109 | |a Zimmerman, Michael J. 1951- | ||
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Organic Unities and the Problem of Evil |b A Reply to Lemos |c Michael J. Zimmerman |
| 264 | 1 | |c [2019] | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen |b n |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a Band |b nc |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 520 | |a Chapter 9 constitutes a critical examination of Noah Lemos's contribution to this volume (see Chapter 8). It addresses Lemos's defense of G. E. Moore's principle of organic unities against three objections. The first objection concerns what is involved in contributing to the intrinsic value of a state of affairs; the second concerns a kind of evaluative schizophrenia; and the third concerns the concept of evaluative inadequacy. Lemos's response to the third objection is examined at length, and it is argued that this response may not succeed in defeating the objection, in which case the problem of evil may not be as easy to solve as some theodicists have suggested | ||
| 601 | |a Problem | ||
| 652 | |a AB:NCA | ||
| 689 | 0 | 0 | |d s |0 (DE-588)4007524-2 |0 (DE-627)104162554 |0 (DE-576)208870830 |2 gnd |a Das Böse |
| 689 | 0 | |5 (DE-627) | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Oxford studies in philosophy of religion |d Oxford : University Press, 2008 |g 9(2019), Seite 183-194 |w (DE-627)571166229 |w (DE-600)2433603-8 |w (DE-576)325342938 |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:9 |g year:2019 |g pages:183-194 |
| 787 | 0 | 8 | |i Kritik von |a Lemos, Noah M., 1956 - |t Organic Unities, Summation, and the Problem of Evil |d 2019 |w (DE-627)1695012070 |
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| ELC | |b 1 | ||
| ITA | |a 1 |t 1 | ||
| LOK | |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 | ||
| LOK | |0 001 3627509757 | ||
| LOK | |0 003 DE-627 | ||
| LOK | |0 004 1695015525 | ||
| LOK | |0 005 20200630153735 | ||
| LOK | |0 008 200420||||||||||||||||ger||||||| | ||
| LOK | |0 040 |a DE-Tue135 |c DE-627 |d DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 092 |o n | ||
| LOK | |0 852 |a DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 852 1 |9 00 | ||
| LOK | |0 935 |a ixzs | ||
| LOK | |0 936ln |0 1442042990 |a AB | ||
| LOK | |0 936ln |0 1442052465 |a NCA | ||
| ORI | |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw | ||
| REL | |a 1 | ||
| STA | 0 | 0 | |a Evil,Evil |
| STB | 0 | 0 | |a Le mal |
| STC | 0 | 0 | |a El malo |
| STD | 0 | 0 | |a Il male |
| STE | 0 | 0 | |a 罪恶,恶,邪恶,罪恶,恶,邪恶 |
| STF | 0 | 0 | |a 罪惡,惡,邪惡,罪惡,惡,邪惡 |
| STG | 0 | 0 | |a O mal |
| STH | 0 | 0 | |a Зло |
| STI | 0 | 0 | |a Το Κακό |
| SUB | |a REL | ||
| SYG | 0 | 0 | |a Das Böse |