Defining morality, applying standards and shaping attitudes: replies to Copson, Hobbs and Kotzee
In the preceding articles, Andrew Copson, Angie Hobbs and Ben Kotzee make a number of interesting criticisms of my book, A Theory of Moral Education. Here I offer some replies.
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Electronic Article |
Language: | English |
Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
Journals Online & Print: | |
Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
Published: |
Routledge
[2020]
|
In: |
Journal of beliefs and values
Year: 2020, Volume: 41, Issue: 2, Pages: 237-240 |
Standardized Subjects / Keyword chains: | B
Morals
/ Definition
/ Moral development
/ Education
|
RelBib Classification: | AH Religious education NCA Ethics ZF Education |
Further subjects: | B
Theism
B Moral Formation B Moral Education B problem of sociality B Naturalism B indoctrination B moral standards |
Online Access: |
Presumably Free Access Volltext (Verlag) |
Summary: | In the preceding articles, Andrew Copson, Angie Hobbs and Ben Kotzee make a number of interesting criticisms of my book, A Theory of Moral Education. Here I offer some replies. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1469-9362 |
Reference: | Kritik von "Good in theory (2020)"
Kritik von "A call to moral arms (2020)" Kritik von "Right answer, wrong problem (2020)" |
Contains: | Enthalten in: Journal of beliefs and values
|
Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1080/13617672.2020.1717224 |