Secularisation of Religion as the Source of Religious Gender Stereotypes
Secular-religious dichotomy has been criticised in discourse on secularisation theory as well as in discussions of the relationship between secular and religious feminism. Feminist theorists have criticised the secular-religious divide of feminism for overlooking facts such as the inherent gendering...
| Authors: | ; |
|---|---|
| Format: | Electronic Article |
| Language: | English |
| Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Drawer...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Published: |
Sage
[2020]
|
| In: |
Feminist theology
Year: 2020, Volume: 28, Issue: 3, Pages: 264-281 |
| RelBib Classification: | AD Sociology of religion; religious policy BJ Islam CH Christianity and Society FD Contextual theology NBE Anthropology |
| Further subjects: | B
Feminism
B Islam B anti-gender Movement B Secularisation B Christianity B Gender B Gender stereotypes |
| Online Access: |
Volltext (Verlag) Volltext (doi) |
MARC
| LEADER | 00000caa a22000002 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | 169730561X | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20210726113338.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 200506s2020 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1177/0966735020906949 |2 doi | |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)169730561X | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)KXP169730561X | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rda | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 084 | |a 0 |a 1 |2 ssgn | ||
| 100 | 1 | |e VerfasserIn |0 (DE-588)1031180419 |0 (DE-627)735798915 |0 (DE-576)188999841 |4 aut |a Anić, Rebeka Jadranka |d 1960- | |
| 109 | |a Anić, Rebeka Jadranka 1960- |a Anić, Rebeka J. 1960- |a Anić, Rebeka 1960- |a Anić, Jadranka Rebeka 1960- | ||
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Secularisation of Religion as the Source of Religious Gender Stereotypes |
| 264 | 1 | |c [2020] | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 520 | |a Secular-religious dichotomy has been criticised in discourse on secularisation theory as well as in discussions of the relationship between secular and religious feminism. Feminist theorists have criticised the secular-religious divide of feminism for overlooking facts such as the inherent gendering of this dichotomy, the participation of women believers in the gender equality movement since its inception, and the contributions of feminist theologians and gender studies scholars who use their respective religious traditions as a basis for gender egalitarianism. This article will criticise secular-religious dichotomy for overlooking the fact that secular, rather than religious, principles underlie gender stereotypes. Namely, Christian and Islamic theological anthropology has accepted philosophical postulates regarding the nature of women and used them to build models of subordination and complementarity of gender relations, thereby neglecting the egalitarian anthropology that can be developed based on the holy scriptures of both traditions. One of the challenges in exploring the secular-religious dichotomy can be found in the anti-gender movement in which believers join secular organizations and use secular discourse to advocate and preserve gender stereotypes. | ||
| 601 | |a Religion | ||
| 601 | |a Stereotyp | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a Christianity | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Islam | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Secularisation | |
| 650 | 4 | |a anti-gender Movement | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Feminism | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Gender | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Gender stereotypes | |
| 652 | |a AD:BJ:CH:FD:NBE | ||
| 700 | 1 | |e VerfasserIn |0 (DE-588)1053956770 |0 (DE-627)790852519 |0 (DE-576)409786454 |4 aut |a Spahić-Šiljak, Zilka |d 1968- | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Feminist theology |d Thousand Oaks, Calif. : Sage, 1992 |g 28(2020), 3, Seite 264-281 |h Online-Ressource |w (DE-627)341897612 |w (DE-600)2069502-0 |w (DE-576)254072119 |x 1745-5189 |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:28 |g year:2020 |g number:3 |g pages:264-281 |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1177/0966735020906949 |x Verlag |
| 856 | |u https://doi.org/10.1177/0966735020906949 |x doi |3 Volltext | ||
| 935 | |a mteo | ||
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| ELC | |a 1 | ||
| ITA | |a 1 |t 1 | ||
| LOK | |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 | ||
| LOK | |0 001 3660965642 | ||
| LOK | |0 003 DE-627 | ||
| LOK | |0 004 169730561X | ||
| LOK | |0 005 20210726113338 | ||
| LOK | |0 008 200506||||||||||||||||ger||||||| | ||
| LOK | |0 035 |a (DE-Tue135)IxTheo#2020-05-05#474FBA4FC7098FB0DE59B133E1D8EE8B9CDB37E9 | ||
| LOK | |0 040 |a DE-Tue135 |c DE-627 |d DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 092 |o n | ||
| LOK | |0 852 |a DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 852 1 |9 00 | ||
| LOK | |0 935 |a ixzs |a ixzo |a zota | ||
| LOK | |0 936ln |0 1442043016 |a AD | ||
| LOK | |0 936ln |0 1442043539 |a BJ | ||
| LOK | |0 936ln |0 1550735845 |a CH | ||
| LOK | |0 936ln |0 1442044071 |a FD | ||
| LOK | |0 936ln |0 144205168X |a NBE | ||
| ORI | |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw | ||
| REL | |a 1 | ||
| STA | 0 | 0 | |a Islam,Islam |
| STB | 0 | 0 | |a Islam,Islam |
| STC | 0 | 0 | |a Islam,Islam |
| STD | 0 | 0 | |a Islam,Islam |
| STE | 0 | 0 | |a 伊斯兰教,伊斯兰教,回教,回教 |
| STF | 0 | 0 | |a 伊斯蘭教,伊斯蘭教,回教,回教 |
| STG | 0 | 0 | |a Islã,Islã |
| STH | 0 | 0 | |a Ислам (мотив),Ислам |
| STI | 0 | 0 | |a Ισλάμ (μοτίβο),Ισλάμ |
| SUB | |a REL | ||
| SYE | 0 | 0 | |a Islam , Soziales Geschlecht,Geschlecht,Geschlecht |