Constantius III, Galla Placidia, and Libanius the Magician: Olympiodorus of Thebes and the Reconstruction of Imperial Politics in Ravenna in 421

In Fragmentum 36, the ninth-century Photius, patriarch of Constantinople, summarises Olympiodorus of Thebes teratological story about Libanius the magician and the contradictory responses to his presence in Ravenna by Constantius III and his wife, Galla Placidia. The story of the dispute between the...

Description complète

Enregistré dans:  
Détails bibliographiques
Publié dans:Journal for late antique religion and culture
Auteur principal: Dunn, Geoffrey D. 1962- (Auteur)
Type de support: Électronique Article
Langue:Anglais
Vérifier la disponibilité: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
En cours de chargement...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Publié: [2020]
Dans: Journal for late antique religion and culture
Année: 2020, Volume: 14, Pages: 50-64
Sujets / Chaînes de mots-clés standardisés:B Olympiodorus, Thebanus, Historikoi logoi / Constantius, III., Römisches Reich, Kaiser -421 / Galla Placidia, Römisches Reich, Kaiserin 391-450 / Libanius 314-393 / Christianisme / Paganisme / Ravenna / Geschichte 412
RelBib Classification:BE Religion gréco-romaine
CG Christianisme et politique
KAB Christianisme primitif
KDF Église orthodoxe
Sujets non-standardisés:B Honorius
B Constantius III
B Magic
B Olympiodorus
B Galla Placidia
Accès en ligne: Volltext (doi)
Volltext (kostenfrei)
Description
Résumé:In Fragmentum 36, the ninth-century Photius, patriarch of Constantinople, summarises Olympiodorus of Thebes teratological story about Libanius the magician and the contradictory responses to his presence in Ravenna by Constantius III and his wife, Galla Placidia. The story of the dispute between the couple and of Galla Placidia’s success in having Libanius put to death is to be believed, in the light of what else we can reconstruct about how this married couple operated in other situations. Although R.C. Blockley assessed this story in terms of Olympiodorus’ interest in paganism and magic, it will be argued here that it is best seen in terms of the poet-historian’s hostility to Constantius - something Blockley noted but did not explain. That hostility is to be understood as flowing from Olympiodorus’ aim of providing an encomium for Theodosius II in Constantinople, who was ill-disposed towards Constantius, parallel as it were with the efforts of Claudian for Stilicho, detailed a generation ago by Alan Cameron.
ISSN:1754-517X
Contient:Enthalten in: Journal for late antique religion and culture
Persistent identifiers:DOI: 10.18573/issn.1754-517X