Response to Wunder: objective probability, non-contingent theism, and the EAAN
This article is a response to Tyler Wunder's ‘The modality of theism and probabilistic natural theology: a tension in Alvin Plantinga's philosophy’ (this journal). In his article, Wunder argues that if the proponent of the Evolutionary Argument Against Naturalism (EAAN) holds theism to be...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Contributors: | |
| Format: | Electronic Article |
| Language: | English |
| Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Drawer...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Published: |
Cambridge Univ. Press
[2020]
|
| In: |
Religious studies
Year: 2020, Volume: 56, Issue: 2, Pages: 292-296 |
| RelBib Classification: | AB Philosophy of religion; criticism of religion; atheism FD Contextual theology |
| Online Access: |
Volltext (Verlag) Volltext (doi) |
MARC
| LEADER | 00000caa a22000002 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | 1698575378 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20200806154522.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 200519s2020 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1017/S0034412518000306 |2 doi | |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)1698575378 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)KXP1698575378 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rda | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 084 | |a 0 |2 ssgn | ||
| 100 | 1 | |e VerfasserIn |0 (DE-588)117224216X |0 (DE-627)1041052057 |0 (DE-576)514446862 |4 aut |a Hendricks, Perry | |
| 109 | |a Hendricks, Perry | ||
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Response to Wunder |b objective probability, non-contingent theism, and the EAAN |
| 264 | 1 | |c [2020] | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 520 | |a This article is a response to Tyler Wunder's ‘The modality of theism and probabilistic natural theology: a tension in Alvin Plantinga's philosophy’ (this journal). In his article, Wunder argues that if the proponent of the Evolutionary Argument Against Naturalism (EAAN) holds theism to be non-contingent and frames the argument in terms of objective probability, then the EAAN is either unsound or theism is necessarily false. I argue that a modest revision of the EAAN renders Wunder's objection irrelevant, and that this revision actually widens the scope of the argument. | ||
| 652 | |a AB:FD | ||
| 700 | 1 | |e VerfasserIn des Bezugswerks |0 (DE-588)1052821391 |0 (DE-627)789079550 |0 (DE-576)408553960 |4 ant |a Wunder, Tyler Andrew | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Religious studies |d Cambridge [u.a.] : Cambridge Univ. Press, 1965 |g 56(2020), 2, Seite 292-296 |h Online-Ressource |w (DE-627)265785405 |w (DE-600)1466479-3 |w (DE-576)079718671 |x 1469-901X |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:56 |g year:2020 |g number:2 |g pages:292-296 |
| 787 | 0 | 8 | |i Kritik von |a Wunder, Tyler Andrew |t The modality of theism and probabilistic natural theology |d 2015 |w (DE-627)1569754780 |w (DE-576)499754786 |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/religious-studies/article/response-to-wunder-objective-probability-noncontingent-theism-and-the-eaan/7763506843C7DA1E334287B1CBF23B90 |x Verlag |
| 856 | |u https://doi.org/10.1017/S0034412518000306 |x doi |3 Volltext | ||
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| ELC | |a 1 | ||
| ITA | |a 1 |t 1 | ||
| LOK | |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 | ||
| LOK | |0 001 3668649502 | ||
| LOK | |0 003 DE-627 | ||
| LOK | |0 004 1698575378 | ||
| LOK | |0 005 20200806154522 | ||
| LOK | |0 008 200519||||||||||||||||ger||||||| | ||
| LOK | |0 040 |a DE-Tue135 |c DE-627 |d DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 092 |o n | ||
| LOK | |0 852 |a DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 852 1 |9 00 | ||
| LOK | |0 935 |a ixzs |a ixzo | ||
| LOK | |0 936ln |0 1442042990 |a AB | ||
| LOK | |0 936ln |0 1442044071 |a FD | ||
| ORI | |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw | ||
| REL | |a 1 | ||
| SUB | |a REL | ||