Enemies, For My Sake
This response to Jason A. Springs’s Healthy Conflict in Contemporary Society praises Springs for his recommendations for improving the discourse found in ethical conflicts in public life. Springs’s main prescription is for culture to stop repressing conflict. But if Springs ought to be praised for d...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Contributors: | |
Format: | Electronic Review |
Language: | English |
Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
Journals Online & Print: | |
Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
Published: |
Wiley-Blackwell
[2020]
|
In: |
Journal of religious ethics
Year: 2020, Volume: 48, Issue: 2, Pages: 308-315 |
Review of: | Healthy conflict in contemporary American society (Cambridge : Cambridge University Press, 2018) (Kavka, Martin)
|
RelBib Classification: | AD Sociology of religion; religious policy CH Christianity and Society NCC Social ethics NCD Political ethics |
Further subjects: | B
Book review
B Brett Kavanaugh B Pluralism B Conflict B Enemy |
Online Access: |
Volltext (Verlag) Volltext (doi) |
Summary: | This response to Jason A. Springs’s Healthy Conflict in Contemporary Society praises Springs for his recommendations for improving the discourse found in ethical conflicts in public life. Springs’s main prescription is for culture to stop repressing conflict. But if Springs ought to be praised for desiring to give conflict its due in public life, Healthy Conflict in Contemporary Life ought also to be criticized for not always being clear on whether there are criteria that authorize excluding some people (e.g. white supremacists) from participating in nonviolent cultural conflict. The essay concludes by suggesting a rehabilitation in religious ethics of the category of the enemy. |
---|---|
Item Description: | Book discussion |
ISSN: | 1467-9795 |
Reference: | Kritik in "Healthy Conflict in an Era of Intractability (2020)"
|
Contains: | Enthalten in: Journal of religious ethics
|
Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1111/jore.12311 |