The conceptual significance of the prefatory sugya in the Babylonian Talmud
The prefatory sugya is unique in that the Mishnah is treated as a canonical text to be interpreted homiletically like a biblical verse. In this article I shift the scholarly focus from the technical interpretative methods of the prefatory sugya to its internal meaning. Homiletical interpretation of...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Electronic Article |
Language: | English |
Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
Journals Online & Print: | |
Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
Published: |
Liverpool University Press
[2018]
|
In: |
Journal of Jewish studies
Year: 2018, Volume: 69, Issue: 1, Pages: 22-43 |
Further subjects: | B
INTERPRETATION (Philosophy)
B Jewish literature B Mishnah B Jewish preaching B Talmud |
Online Access: |
Volltext (Verlag) |
Summary: | The prefatory sugya is unique in that the Mishnah is treated as a canonical text to be interpreted homiletically like a biblical verse. In this article I shift the scholarly focus from the technical interpretative methods of the prefatory sugya to its internal meaning. Homiletical interpretation of the Mishnah is merely a rhetorical device employed by the author of the prefatory sugya in order to provide a conceptual preface to the tractate as a whole or to the central topic of the opening chapters. With this approach, the possibility emerges that the Talmudic prefatory sugya may have preceded the Savoraim, and may be considered a natural extension of the familiar petihta Midrash genre. This new 'content approach' significantly shifts and enriches our perception of the literary role of the prefatory sugya, from a playful intellectual curiosity to meaningful dicta of the sages emphasizing essential principles and values of the tractate. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 2056-6689 |
Contains: | Enthalten in: Journal of Jewish studies
|
Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.18647/3349/jjs-2018 |