Secularization research and its competitors: A response to my critics
This article is a response to the articles published in this issue of Social Compass by François Gauthier, Tobias Müller, David Voas and Sarah Wilkens-Laflamme about the presidential address given by Jörg Stolz at the SISR Congress in July 2019 and titled Secularization theories in the twenty-first...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Electronic Article |
Language: | English |
Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
Journals Online & Print: | |
Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
Published: |
Sage
[2020]
|
In: |
Social compass
Year: 2020, Volume: 67, Issue: 2, Pages: 337-346 |
Standardized Subjects / Keyword chains: | B
Science of Religion
/ Secularization
/ Theory
|
RelBib Classification: | AB Philosophy of religion; criticism of religion; atheism AD Sociology of religion; religious policy |
Further subjects: | B
Deprivation
B Pluralism B Régulation B Socialisation B secular competition B déprivation B Regulation B compétition laïque B Pluralisme B Socialization |
Online Access: |
Volltext (Verlag) |
Summary: | This article is a response to the articles published in this issue of Social Compass by François Gauthier, Tobias Müller, David Voas and Sarah Wilkens-Laflamme about the presidential address given by Jörg Stolz at the SISR Congress in July 2019 and titled Secularization theories in the twenty-first century: Ideas, evidence, and problems. Cet article constitue une réponse aux articles de débats publiés dans ce numéro de Social Compass par François Gauthier, Tobias Müller, David Voas et Sarah Wilkens-Laflamme à propos du discours présidentiel par Jörg Stolz lors du Congrès de la SISR de juillet 2019 et intitulée Secularization theories in the twenty-first century: Ideas, evidence, and problems. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1461-7404 |
Contains: | Enthalten in: Social compass
|
Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1177/0037768620917331 |