Between Identity and Difference: Three Ways of Reading Nishida's Non-Dualism
The philosophy of Nishida Kitarō offers the reader today not only a paradigm for a comparative philosophy, but also a methodological framework to construct a Buddhist philosophy. The key and, at the same time, the obstacle to his philosophy is the concept of the "self-identity of the absolute c...
| Publié dans: | Japanese journal of religious studies |
|---|---|
| Auteur principal: | |
| Type de support: | Électronique Article |
| Langue: | Anglais |
| Vérifier la disponibilité: | HBZ Gateway |
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Publié: |
Nanzan Institute
[2004]
|
| Dans: |
Japanese journal of religious studies
Année: 2004, Volume: 31, Numéro: 1, Pages: 73-103 |
| Sujets non-standardisés: | B
Religious monism
B Nothingness B Terminology B Identity Theory B Self Concept B Nondualism B Subjectivity B Difference B Contradictories B Dualism |
| Accès en ligne: |
Volltext (kostenfrei) |
| Résumé: | The philosophy of Nishida Kitarō offers the reader today not only a paradigm for a comparative philosophy, but also a methodological framework to construct a Buddhist philosophy. The key and, at the same time, the obstacle to his philosophy is the concept of the "self-identity of the absolute contradiction." This conceptual cornerstone of Nishida's philosophy is as controversial among scholars today as it is central to his philosophy. Critics, such as Tanabe Hajime and Takahashi Satomi, argue that Nishida's philosophy privileges the principle of identity over that of difference and falls into a monism; his supporters, most of all Nishitani Keiji and Ueda Shizuteru, to the contrary, claim that it comprises the key to philosophical non-dualism. In general, I am convinced that even his "self-identity of the absolute contradiction," if it is read carefully within the context of Nishida's philosophy, will render a paradigm that falls neither into a logical contradiction nor into a monism but that provides the foundation for a non-dualist philosophy. To this end, I will reread it first in the context of Nishida's overall project and, then, on the background of Nishida's debates with his critics. |
|---|---|
| Contient: | Enthalten in: Japanese journal of religious studies
|