Soul-making and social progress

I argue that John Hick’s soul-making theodicy is committed to opposing social progress. By focusing on justifying the current amount and distribution of suffering and evil, Hick’s theodicy ends up having to condemn even positive change as undesirable. First, I give a brief outline of Hick’s theodicy...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Hemmingsen, Michael (Author)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Drawer...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Published: Springer Nature B. V [2020]
In: International journal for philosophy of religion
Year: 2020, Volume: 88, Issue: 1, Pages: 81-96
Standardized Subjects / Keyword chains:B Hick, John 1922-2012 / Theodicy / Social progress
RelBib Classification:AB Philosophy of religion; criticism of religion; atheism
NBC Doctrine of God
NBE Anthropology
Online Access: Volltext (Verlag)

MARC

LEADER 00000caa a22000002 4500
001 1725078171
003 DE-627
005 20200827171632.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 200717s2020 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.1007/s11153-019-09726-x  |2 doi 
035 |a (DE-627)1725078171 
035 |a (DE-599)KXP1725078171 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 0  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |a Hemmingsen, Michael  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
245 1 0 |a Soul-making and social progress 
264 1 |c [2020] 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a I argue that John Hick’s soul-making theodicy is committed to opposing social progress. By focusing on justifying the current amount and distribution of suffering and evil, Hick’s theodicy ends up having to condemn even positive change as undesirable. First, I give a brief outline of Hick’s theodicy, with a particular emphasis on the role of earned virtue in justifying the existence of evil. Then I consider two understandings of social progress: progress as the elimination of suffering and evil; and progress as the promotion of earned virtue. I further distinguish the earned virtue understanding of social progress into two kinds, in which the relationship between social structures and moral growth either: (1) allows members of a more advanced society to start closer to perfection; or (2) allows members of a more advanced society to progress more quickly (and presumably further). I argue that no matter which approach we take, Hick’s theodicy struggles with the idea of social progress. Hick is either straightforwardly committed to opposing social progress, or he can support it only at the expense of being unable to justify status quo of suffering and evil. 
652 |a AB:NBC:NBE 
689 0 0 |d p  |0 (DE-588)119231344  |0 (DE-627)080031080  |0 (DE-576)21140604X  |2 gnd  |a Hick, John  |d 1922-2012 
689 0 1 |d s  |0 (DE-588)4059740-4  |0 (DE-627)104589558  |0 (DE-576)209132027  |2 gnd  |a Theodizee 
689 0 2 |d s  |0 (DE-588)4077583-5  |0 (DE-627)106079700  |0 (DE-576)209205725  |2 gnd  |a Sozialer Fortschritt 
689 0 |5 (DE-627) 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t International journal for philosophy of religion  |d Dordrecht : Springer Nature B.V, 1970  |g 88(2020), 1, Seite 81-96  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)320442098  |w (DE-600)2005049-5  |w (DE-576)103746927  |x 1572-8684  |7 nnns 
773 1 8 |g volume:88  |g year:2020  |g number:1  |g pages:81-96 
856 4 0 |u https://doi.org/10.1007/s11153-019-09726-x  |x Verlag 
951 |a AR 
ELC |a 1 
ITA |a 1  |t 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 3725538522 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1725078171 
LOK |0 005 20200827171632 
LOK |0 008 200717||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-Tue135  |c DE-627  |d DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 935   |a ixzs  |a ixzo 
LOK |0 936ln  |0 1442042990  |a AB 
LOK |0 936ln  |0 144205168X  |a NBE 
LOK |0 936ln  |0 1442051507  |a NBC 
ORI |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw 
REL |a 1 
STA 0 0 |a Social progress,Society,Theodicy,Theodicy 
STB 0 0 |a Progrès social,Théodicée,Théodicée 
STC 0 0 |a Progreso social,Teodicea,Teodicea 
STD 0 0 |a Progresso sociale,Teodicea,Teodicea 
STE 0 0 |a 社会进步,神义论,神义论,神正论,神正论 
STF 0 0 |a 社會進步,神義論,神義論,神正論,神正論 
STG 0 0 |a Progresso social,Teodiceia,Teodiceia 
STH 0 0 |a Социальный прогресс,Теодицея (мотив),Теодицея 
STI 0 0 |a Θεοδικία (μοτίβο),Θεοδικία,Κοινωνική πρόοδος 
SUB |a REL 
SYG 0 0 |a Hick, John H.,1922-2012,Hick, John Harwood,1922-2012 , Gesellschaft,Gesellschaftlicher Fortschritt