What ontological arguments don’t show
Daniel Dombrowski contends that: (1) a number of versions of the ontological argument [OA] are sound; (2) the deity whose existence is most well established by the OA is the deity picked out by Hartshorne’s neoclassical concept of God; (3) skeptics who insist that the OA only shows that “if God exis...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Electronic Article |
Language: | English |
Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
Journals Online & Print: | |
Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
Published: |
Springer Nature B. V
[2020]
|
In: |
International journal for philosophy of religion
Year: 2020, Volume: 88, Issue: 1, Pages: 97-114 |
Standardized Subjects / Keyword chains: | B
Existence of God
/ Ontological proof of God's existence
|
RelBib Classification: | AB Philosophy of religion; criticism of religion; atheism NBC Doctrine of God |
Online Access: |
Volltext (Verlag) |