Encountering Finitude, Confronting Infinitude: Leo Tolstoy, Emmanuel Levinas, and the Ethics of Non-Resistance
This article follows a strand of ethical thought that weaves itself throughout Leo Tolstoy’s religious writings: the injunction of non-resistance. This ethical position has been described by some critics as a form of religious idolatry in Tolstoy’s work. I challenge that claim in this article by dep...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Electronic Article |
Language: | English |
Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
Journals Online & Print: | |
Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
Published: |
Sage
[2019]
|
In: |
Studies in Christian ethics
Year: 2020, Volume: 33, Issue: 3, Pages: 318-335 |
RelBib Classification: | KAH Church history 1648-1913; modern history NBE Anthropology NCC Social ethics TK Recent history VA Philosophy |
Further subjects: | B
Emmanuel Levinas
B non-resistance B Continental Philosophy B Christian Ethics B Leo Tolstoy |
Online Access: |
Volltext (Resolving-System) |
MARC
LEADER | 00000caa a22000002 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | 1725254069 | ||
003 | DE-627 | ||
005 | 20211021143156.0 | ||
007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
008 | 200722s2019 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
024 | 7 | |a 10.1177/0953946819860345 |2 doi | |
035 | |a (DE-627)1725254069 | ||
035 | |a (DE-599)KXP1725254069 | ||
040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rda | ||
041 | |a eng | ||
084 | |a 1 |2 ssgn | ||
100 | 1 | |a Fishley, Daniel |e VerfasserIn |4 aut | |
245 | 1 | 0 | |a Encountering Finitude, Confronting Infinitude |b Leo Tolstoy, Emmanuel Levinas, and the Ethics of Non-Resistance |
264 | 1 | |c [2019] | |
336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
520 | |a This article follows a strand of ethical thought that weaves itself throughout Leo Tolstoy’s religious writings: the injunction of non-resistance. This ethical position has been described by some critics as a form of religious idolatry in Tolstoy’s work. I challenge that claim in this article by deploying the work of Emmanuel Levinas to provide much needed nuance to Tolstoy’s call for non-resistance. Via the ethical framework provided by Levinas, I contend that Tolstoy’s positions are built upon a conception of the finite world that sees a proper comportment to finitude as the mode by which one engages the infinite. This ethical call is one that escapes satiation by demanding a ceaseless act of non-resistance—which is, for him, the essential kernel of the Christian message. Tolstoy’s God, I argue, is this infinite demand; something akin to an ethical claim that marks the subject—a mandate that is met when one enacts the ethical obligation of non-resistance. | ||
601 | |a Emmanuel, S. J. | ||
650 | 4 | |a Christian Ethics | |
650 | 4 | |a Emmanuel Levinas | |
650 | 4 | |a Leo Tolstoy | |
650 | 4 | |a Continental Philosophy | |
650 | 4 | |a non-resistance | |
652 | |a KAH:NBE:NCC:TK:VA | ||
773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Studies in Christian ethics |d London : Sage, 1988 |g 33(2020), 3, Seite 318-335 |h Online-Ressource |w (DE-627)368910555 |w (DE-600)2118000-3 |w (DE-576)11946067X |x 0953-9468 |7 nnns |
773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:33 |g year:2020 |g number:3 |g pages:318-335 |
856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.1177/0953946819860345 |x Resolving-System |
951 | |a AR | ||
ELC | |a 1 | ||
ITA | |a 1 |t 1 | ||
LOK | |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 | ||
LOK | |0 001 3727850922 | ||
LOK | |0 003 DE-627 | ||
LOK | |0 004 1725254069 | ||
LOK | |0 005 20220913121214 | ||
LOK | |0 008 200722||||||||||||||||ger||||||| | ||
LOK | |0 040 |a DE-Tue135 |c DE-627 |d DE-Tue135 | ||
LOK | |0 092 |o n | ||
LOK | |0 852 |a DE-Tue135 | ||
LOK | |0 852 1 |9 00 | ||
LOK | |0 935 |a ixzs |a ixzo | ||
LOK | |0 936ln |0 1442053887 |a TK | ||
LOK | |0 936ln |0 1442044624 |a KAH | ||
LOK | |0 936ln |0 144205168X |a NBE | ||
LOK | |0 936ln |0 1442053844 |a VA | ||
LOK | |0 936ln |0 144205283X |a NCC | ||
ORI | |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw | ||
REL | |a 1 | ||
SUB | |a REL |