How Accurately Could Early (622-900 C.E.) Muslims Determine the Direction of Prayers (Qibla)?

Debate has arisen over the ability of Muslim architects in the first two centuries of Islam to determine true qiblas accurately. Some believe that they had such a capability, while others think not. The argument could be more complex—perhaps some architects could, while others could not; perhaps the...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Schumm, Walter R. (Author)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Drawer...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Published: MDPI [2020]
In: Religions
Year: 2020, Volume: 11, Issue: 3
Further subjects:B Islam
B qibla
B Dan Gibson
B statistics and religion
B early Islamic history
Online Access: Presumably Free Access
Volltext (Verlag)
Volltext (doi)

MARC

LEADER 00000caa a22000002 4500
001 1727070895
003 DE-627
005 20210127083921.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 200814s2020 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.3390/rel11030102  |2 doi 
035 |a (DE-627)1727070895 
035 |a (DE-599)KXP1727070895 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 1  |a 0  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |a Schumm, Walter R.  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
109 |a Schumm, Walter R. 
245 1 0 |a How Accurately Could Early (622-900 C.E.) Muslims Determine the Direction of Prayers (Qibla)? 
264 1 |c [2020] 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a Debate has arisen over the ability of Muslim architects in the first two centuries of Islam to determine true qiblas accurately. Some believe that they had such a capability, while others think not. The argument could be more complex—perhaps some architects could, while others could not; perhaps their accuracy changed over time or over greater distances from qibla targets. Here, we investigated how the accurate qiblas of 60 mosques or related structures were, using data from Daniel Gibson’s books and websites. Contrasts were drawn between theories that the qiblas of early mosques were—or were not—generally accurate. If one were to assume that Mecca was the only qibla, qiblas would not appear to have been accurate. However, if one were to assume that qiblas changed, it would be found that qiblas were accurate to plus or minus two degrees in over half of the cases and accurate within plus or minus five degrees in over 80% of cases. Accuracy was not related to distance but did appear to improve over historical time, while distance from the target cities and historical time were positively associated. The average qibla accuracy had a near zero error, with random variations on either side of that zero error. The overall distribution was not normal—kurtotic—because a greater accuracy was found than would have been expected with a normal distribution; however, the pattern deviated more from a uniform distribution than it did from a normal distribution. To try to synthesize the competing theories, we analyzed data for only 14 of the 60 mosques, those presumed to face towards Mecca, and we found fairly high degrees of qibla accuracy with nearly 43% of qiblas within two degrees of accuracy and nearly 80% within five degrees of accuracy. Comparing the accuracy of Meccan qiblas with other qiblas of the same century, we found no significant differences in azimuth errors. While some architects were more accurate than others, early Muslim architects seemed, in general, quite capable of placing qiblas with reasonable accuracy, even though their accuracy may have improved slightly over the first two centuries of Islam. 
601 |a Determination 
650 4 |a Dan Gibson 
650 4 |a Islam 
650 4 |a early Islamic history 
650 4 |a qibla 
650 4 |a statistics and religion 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t Religions  |d Basel : MDPI, 2010  |g 11(2020,3) Artikel 102  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)665435797  |w (DE-600)2620962-7  |w (DE-576)348219067  |x 2077-1444  |7 nnns 
773 1 8 |g volume:11  |g year:2020  |g number:3 
856 |u https://www.mdpi.com/2077-1444/11/3/102/pdf?version=1583747716  |x unpaywall  |z Vermutlich kostenfreier Zugang  |h publisher [oa journal (via doaj)] 
856 4 0 |u https://www.mdpi.com/2077-1444/11/3/102  |x Verlag 
856 |u https://doi.org/10.3390/rel11030102  |x doi  |3 Volltext 
951 |a AR 
ELC |a 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 3739999330 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1727070895 
LOK |0 005 20200814120210 
LOK |0 008 200814||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-Tue135  |c DE-627  |d DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 935   |a ixzs  |a ixzo 
OAS |a 1 
ORI |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw 
REL |a 1 
STA 0 0 |a Islam,Islam 
STB 0 0 |a Islam,Islam 
STC 0 0 |a Islam,Islam 
STD 0 0 |a Islam,Islam 
STE 0 0 |a 伊斯兰教,伊斯兰教,回教,回教 
STF 0 0 |a 伊斯蘭教,伊斯蘭教,回教,回教 
STG 0 0 |a Islã,Islã 
STH 0 0 |a Ислам (мотив),Ислам 
STI 0 0 |a Ισλάμ (μοτίβο),Ισλάμ 
SUB |a REL 
SYE 0 0 |a Islam