Vaccine mandates, value pluralism, and policy diversity
Political communities across the world have recently sought to tackle rising rates of vaccine hesitancy and refusal, by implementing coercive immunization programs, or by making existing immunization programs more coercive. Many academics and advocates of public health have applauded these policy de...
Authors: | ; |
---|---|
Format: | Electronic Article |
Language: | English |
Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
Journals Online & Print: | |
Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
Published: |
Wiley-Blackwell
[2019]
|
In: |
Bioethics
Year: 2019, Volume: 33, Issue: 9, Pages: 1042-1049 |
RelBib Classification: | NCH Medical ethics ZC Politics in general |
Further subjects: | B
mandatory vaccination
B immunization ethics B Public Health Ethics B Value pluralism B vaccine mandates |
Online Access: |
Volltext (Verlag) Volltext (doi) |
MARC
LEADER | 00000caa a22000002 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | 1727471415 | ||
003 | DE-627 | ||
005 | 20210929183453.0 | ||
007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
008 | 200819s2019 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
024 | 7 | |a 10.1111/bioe.12645 |2 doi | |
035 | |a (DE-627)1727471415 | ||
035 | |a (DE-599)KXP1727471415 | ||
040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rda | ||
041 | |a eng | ||
084 | |a 1 |2 ssgn | ||
100 | 1 | |a Navin, Mark C. |e VerfasserIn |4 aut | |
245 | 1 | 0 | |a Vaccine mandates, value pluralism, and policy diversity |
264 | 1 | |c [2019] | |
336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
520 | |a Political communities across the world have recently sought to tackle rising rates of vaccine hesitancy and refusal, by implementing coercive immunization programs, or by making existing immunization programs more coercive. Many academics and advocates of public health have applauded these policy developments, and they have invoked ethical reasons for implementing or strengthening vaccine mandates. Others have criticized these policies on ethical grounds, for undermining liberty, and as symptoms of broader government overreach. But such arguments often obscure or abstract away from the diverse values that are relevant to the ethical justifications of particular political communities’ vaccine-mandate policies. We argue for an expansive conception of the normative issues relevant to deciding whether and how to establish or reform vaccine mandates, and we propose a schema by which to organize our thoughts about the ways in which different kinds of vaccine-mandate policies implicate various values. | ||
650 | 4 | |a immunization ethics | |
650 | 4 | |a mandatory vaccination | |
650 | 4 | |a Public Health Ethics | |
650 | 4 | |a vaccine mandates | |
650 | 4 | |a Value pluralism | |
652 | |a NCH:ZC | ||
700 | 1 | |a Attwell, Katie |e VerfasserIn |4 aut | |
773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Bioethics |d Oxford [u.a.] : Wiley-Blackwell, 1987 |g 33(2019), 9, Seite 1042-1049 |h Online-Ressource |w (DE-627)271596708 |w (DE-600)1480658-7 |w (DE-576)078707986 |x 1467-8519 |7 nnns |
773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:33 |g year:2019 |g number:9 |g pages:1042-1049 |
856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/bioe.12645 |x Verlag |
856 | |u https://doi.org/10.1111/bioe.12645 |x doi |3 Volltext | ||
951 | |a AR | ||
ELC | |a 1 | ||
ITA | |a 1 |t 1 | ||
LOK | |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 | ||
LOK | |0 001 3741236462 | ||
LOK | |0 003 DE-627 | ||
LOK | |0 004 1727471415 | ||
LOK | |0 005 20210929183453 | ||
LOK | |0 008 200819||||||||||||||||ger||||||| | ||
LOK | |0 040 |a DE-Tue135 |c DE-627 |d DE-Tue135 | ||
LOK | |0 092 |o n | ||
LOK | |0 852 |a DE-Tue135 | ||
LOK | |0 852 1 |9 00 | ||
LOK | |0 935 |a ixzs |a ixzo | ||
LOK | |0 936ln |0 1550736558 |a NCH | ||
LOK | |0 936ln |0 1550736965 |a ZC | ||
ORI | |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw | ||
REL | |a 1 | ||
SUB | |a REL |