Conscientious objection in healthcare: How much discretionary space best supports good medicine?
Daniel Sulmasy has recently argued that good medicine depends on physicians having a wide discretionary space in which they can act on their consciences. The only constraints Sulmasy believes we should place on physicians’ discretionary space are those defined by a form of tolerance he derives from...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Electronic Article |
| Language: | English |
| Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Drawer...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Published: |
Wiley-Blackwell
[2019]
|
| In: |
Bioethics
Year: 2019, Volume: 33, Issue: 1, Pages: 154-161 |
| RelBib Classification: | NCH Medical ethics |
| Further subjects: | B
Religious Tolerance
B Locke B Conscience |
| Online Access: |
Presumably Free Access Volltext (Verlag) Volltext (doi) |
MARC
| LEADER | 00000caa a22000002 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | 1727524225 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20230125114806.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 200820s2019 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1111/bioe.12477 |2 doi | |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)1727524225 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)KXP1727524225 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rda | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 084 | |a 1 |a 0 |2 ssgn | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a McConnell, Doug |e VerfasserIn |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Conscientious objection in healthcare |b How much discretionary space best supports good medicine? |
| 264 | 1 | |c [2019] | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 520 | |a Daniel Sulmasy has recently argued that good medicine depends on physicians having a wide discretionary space in which they can act on their consciences. The only constraints Sulmasy believes we should place on physicians’ discretionary space are those defined by a form of tolerance he derives from Locke, whereby people can publicly act in accordance with their personal religious and moral beliefs as long as their actions are not destructive to society. Sulmasy also claims that those who would reject physicians’ right to conscientious objection eliminate discretionary space, thus undermining good medicine and unnecessarily limiting religious freedom. I argue that, although Sulmasy is correct that some discretionary space is necessary for good medicine, he is wrong in thinking that proscribing conscientious objection entails eliminating discretionary space. I illustrate this using Julian Savulescu and Udo Schuklenk’s system for restricting conscientious objections as a counter-example. I then argue that a narrow discretionary space constrained by professional ideals will promote good medicine better than Sulmasy’s wider discretionary space constrained by his conception of tolerance. Sulmasy’s version of discretionary space would have us tolerate actions that are at odds with aspects of good medicine, including aspects that Sulmasy himself explicitly values, such as fiduciary duty. Therefore, if we want the degree of religious freedom in the public sphere that Sulmasy favours then we must decide whether it is worth the cost to the healthcare system. | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a Locke | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Conscience | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Religious Tolerance | |
| 652 | |a NCH | ||
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Bioethics |d Oxford [u.a.] : Wiley-Blackwell, 1987 |g 33(2019), 1, Seite 154-161 |h Online-Ressource |w (DE-627)271596708 |w (DE-600)1480658-7 |w (DE-576)078707986 |x 1467-8519 |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:33 |g year:2019 |g number:1 |g pages:154-161 |
| 856 | |u https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdfdirect/10.1111/bioe.12477 |x unpaywall |z Vermutlich kostenfreier Zugang |h publisher [open (via free article)] | ||
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/bioe.12477 |x Verlag |
| 856 | |u https://doi.org/10.1111/bioe.12477 |x doi |3 Volltext | ||
| 936 | u | w | |d 33 |j 2019 |e 1 |h 154-161 |
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| ELC | |a 1 | ||
| ITA | |a 1 |t 1 | ||
| LOK | |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 | ||
| LOK | |0 001 3741326712 | ||
| LOK | |0 003 DE-627 | ||
| LOK | |0 004 1727524225 | ||
| LOK | |0 005 20210908165242 | ||
| LOK | |0 008 200820||||||||||||||||ger||||||| | ||
| LOK | |0 040 |a DE-Tue135 |c DE-627 |d DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 092 |o n | ||
| LOK | |0 852 |a DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 852 1 |9 00 | ||
| LOK | |0 935 |a ixzs |a ixzo | ||
| LOK | |0 936ln |0 1550736558 |a NCH | ||
| OAS | |a 1 | ||
| ORI | |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw | ||
| REL | |a 1 | ||
| SUB | |a REL | ||