Objection to Conscience: An Argument Against Conscience Exemptions in Healthcare
I argue that appeals to conscience do not constitute reasons for granting healthcare professionals exemptions from providing services they consider immoral (e.g. abortion). My argument is based on a comparison between a type of objection that many people think should be granted, i.e. to abortion, an...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Electronic Article |
Language: | English |
Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
Journals Online & Print: | |
Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
Published: |
Wiley-Blackwell
[2017]
|
In: |
Bioethics
Year: 2017, Volume: 31, Issue: 5, Pages: 400-408 |
RelBib Classification: | NCH Medical ethics VA Philosophy |
Further subjects: | B
Conscientious Objection
B Conscience B Professionalism |
Online Access: |
Presumably Free Access Volltext (Verlag) Volltext (doi) |
MARC
LEADER | 00000caa a22000002 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | 1727655672 | ||
003 | DE-627 | ||
005 | 20210902111152.0 | ||
007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
008 | 200824s2017 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
024 | 7 | |a 10.1111/bioe.12333 |2 doi | |
035 | |a (DE-627)1727655672 | ||
035 | |a (DE-599)KXP1727655672 | ||
040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rda | ||
041 | |a eng | ||
084 | |a 1 |2 ssgn | ||
100 | 1 | |a Giubilini, Alberto |e VerfasserIn |4 aut | |
109 | |a Giubilini, Alberto | ||
245 | 1 | 0 | |a Objection to Conscience |b An Argument Against Conscience Exemptions in Healthcare |
264 | 1 | |c [2017] | |
336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
520 | |a I argue that appeals to conscience do not constitute reasons for granting healthcare professionals exemptions from providing services they consider immoral (e.g. abortion). My argument is based on a comparison between a type of objection that many people think should be granted, i.e. to abortion, and one that most people think should not be granted, i.e. to antibiotics. I argue that there is no principled reason in favour of conscientious objection qua conscientious that allows to treat these two cases differently. Therefore, I conclude that there is no principled reason for granting conscientious objection qua conscientious in healthcare. What matters for the purpose of justifying exemptions is not whether an objection is ‘conscientious’, but whether it is based on the principles and values informing the profession. I provide examples of acceptable forms of objection in healthcare. | ||
601 | |a Argumentation | ||
650 | 4 | |a Conscience | |
650 | 4 | |a Conscientious Objection | |
650 | 4 | |a Professionalism | |
652 | |a NCH:VA | ||
773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Bioethics |d Oxford [u.a.] : Wiley-Blackwell, 1987 |g 31(2017), 5, Seite 400-408 |h Online-Ressource |w (DE-627)271596708 |w (DE-600)1480658-7 |w (DE-576)078707986 |x 1467-8519 |7 nnns |
773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:31 |g year:2017 |g number:5 |g pages:400-408 |
856 | |u https://ora.ox.ac.uk/objects/uuid:7e9d6ac9-a56d-4439-9d20-980542c48add/files/m92bdb26cd4fc2a8affbe8a38ab723f1a |x unpaywall |z Vermutlich kostenfreier Zugang |h repository [oa repository (via OAI-PMH title and first author match)] | ||
856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/bioe.12333 |x Verlag |
856 | |u https://doi.org/10.1111/bioe.12333 |x doi |3 Volltext | ||
951 | |a AR | ||
ELC | |a 1 | ||
ITA | |a 1 |t 1 | ||
LOK | |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 | ||
LOK | |0 001 3742292447 | ||
LOK | |0 003 DE-627 | ||
LOK | |0 004 1727655672 | ||
LOK | |0 005 20210902111152 | ||
LOK | |0 008 200824||||||||||||||||ger||||||| | ||
LOK | |0 040 |a DE-Tue135 |c DE-627 |d DE-Tue135 | ||
LOK | |0 092 |o n | ||
LOK | |0 852 |a DE-Tue135 | ||
LOK | |0 852 1 |9 00 | ||
LOK | |0 935 |a ixzs |a ixzo | ||
LOK | |0 936ln |0 1550736558 |a NCH | ||
LOK | |0 936ln |0 1442053844 |a VA | ||
OAS | |a 1 | ||
ORI | |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw | ||
REL | |a 1 | ||
SUB | |a REL |