Response: Freedom from Pain as a Rawlsian Primary Good
In a recent article in this journal, Carl Knight and Andreas Albertsen argue that Rawlsian theories of distributive justice as applied to health and healthcare fail to accommodate both palliative care and the desirability of less painful treatments. The asserted Rawlsian focus on opportunities or ca...
| Auteur principal: | |
|---|---|
| Type de support: | Électronique Article |
| Langue: | Anglais |
| Vérifier la disponibilité: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | En cours de chargement...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Publié: |
Wiley-Blackwell
[2016]
|
| Dans: |
Bioethics
Année: 2016, Volume: 30, Numéro: 9, Pages: 774-775 |
| RelBib Classification: | NCB Éthique individuelle NCH Éthique médicale VA Philosophie |
| Sujets non-standardisés: | B
Justice
B allocating healthcare B Political Philosophy B Medical Ethics B Palliative Care B tributive B Rawls B pain relief ethics |
| Accès en ligne: |
Volltext (Verlag) Volltext (doi) |