The Responsibility Objection to Abortion: Rejecting the Notion that the Responsibility Objection Successfully Refutes a Woman's Right to Choose
This article considers the objection to abortion that a woman who voluntarily engages in sexual activity is responsible for her fetus and so cannot have an abortion. The conclusion argued for is that the conceptions of responsibility that can ground the objection that are considered do not necessita...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Electronic Article |
Language: | English |
Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
Journals Online & Print: | |
Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
Published: |
Wiley-Blackwell
[2015]
|
In: |
Bioethics
Year: 2015, Volume: 29, Issue: 4, Pages: 291-299 |
RelBib Classification: | NCB Personal ethics NCH Medical ethics VA Philosophy |
Further subjects: | B
Thomson
B Consent B Harm B Negligence B Responsibility B Abortion B Care |
Online Access: |
Volltext (Verlag) Volltext (doi) |
MARC
LEADER | 00000caa a22000002 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | 1727700384 | ||
003 | DE-627 | ||
005 | 20210812095602.0 | ||
007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
008 | 200824s2015 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
024 | 7 | |a 10.1111/bioe.12097 |2 doi | |
035 | |a (DE-627)1727700384 | ||
035 | |a (DE-599)KXP1727700384 | ||
040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rda | ||
041 | |a eng | ||
084 | |a 1 |2 ssgn | ||
100 | 1 | |a McDaniel, Ian |e VerfasserIn |4 aut | |
245 | 1 | 4 | |a The Responsibility Objection to Abortion |b Rejecting the Notion that the Responsibility Objection Successfully Refutes a Woman's Right to Choose |
264 | 1 | |c [2015] | |
336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
520 | |a This article considers the objection to abortion that a woman who voluntarily engages in sexual activity is responsible for her fetus and so cannot have an abortion. The conclusion argued for is that the conceptions of responsibility that can ground the objection that are considered do not necessitate a requirement on the part of a pregnant woman to carry her pregnancy to term. Thus, the iterations of the responsibility objection presented cannot be used to curtail reproductive choice. | ||
650 | 4 | |a Thomson | |
650 | 4 | |a Abortion | |
650 | 4 | |a Care | |
650 | 4 | |a Consent | |
650 | 4 | |a Harm | |
650 | 4 | |a Negligence | |
650 | 4 | |a Responsibility | |
652 | |a NCB:NCH:VA | ||
773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Bioethics |d Oxford [u.a.] : Wiley-Blackwell, 1987 |g 29(2015), 4, Seite 291-299 |h Online-Ressource |w (DE-627)271596708 |w (DE-600)1480658-7 |w (DE-576)078707986 |x 1467-8519 |7 nnns |
773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:29 |g year:2015 |g number:4 |g pages:291-299 |
856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/bioe.12097 |x Verlag |
856 | |u https://doi.org/10.1111/bioe.12097 |x doi |3 Volltext | ||
951 | |a AR | ||
ELC | |a 1 | ||
ITA | |a 1 |t 1 | ||
LOK | |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 | ||
LOK | |0 001 3742399136 | ||
LOK | |0 003 DE-627 | ||
LOK | |0 004 1727700384 | ||
LOK | |0 005 20210812095602 | ||
LOK | |0 008 200824||||||||||||||||ger||||||| | ||
LOK | |0 040 |a DE-Tue135 |c DE-627 |d DE-Tue135 | ||
LOK | |0 092 |o n | ||
LOK | |0 852 |a DE-Tue135 | ||
LOK | |0 852 1 |9 00 | ||
LOK | |0 935 |a ixzs |a ixzo | ||
LOK | |0 936ln |0 1550736558 |a NCH | ||
LOK | |0 936ln |0 1442052813 |a NCB | ||
LOK | |0 936ln |0 1442053844 |a VA | ||
ORI | |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw | ||
REL | |a 1 | ||
STA | 0 | 0 | |a Care |
STB | 0 | 0 | |a Care,Sollicitude,Sollicitude |
STC | 0 | 0 | |a Care,Cuidado,Cuidado |
STD | 0 | 0 | |a Care |
STG | 0 | 0 | |a Care,Cuidado,Cuidado |
STH | 0 | 0 | |a Этика заботы |
STI | 0 | 0 | |a Care (ηθική) |
SUB | |a REL |