The god-faculty dilemma: challenges for reformed epistemology in the light of cognitive science

Reformed epistemology (RE) involves a view of knowledge of God which Kelly James Clark and Justin Barrett have brought cognitive science to bear on. They argue that the cognitive science of religion (CSR) indicates that we have a ‘god-faculty’, a notion employed by Alvin Plantinga. Plantinga contend...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Kvandal, Halvor (Author)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Drawer...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Published: Taylor & Francis 2020
In: International journal of philosophy and theology
Year: 2020, Volume: 81, Issue: 4, Pages: 404-422
Standardized Subjects / Keyword chains:B Cognitive science / Religion / Rationality / God
RelBib Classification:AE Psychology of religion
CF Christianity and Science
NBC Doctrine of God
Further subjects:B Cognitive Science
B HADD
B Evolution
B God
B Reformed Epistemology
B Debunking
Online Access: Volltext (kostenfrei)

MARC

LEADER 00000caa a22000002 4500
001 1727712358
003 DE-627
005 20230329091211.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 200825s2020 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.1080/21692327.2020.1753095  |2 doi 
035 |a (DE-627)1727712358 
035 |a (DE-599)KXP1727712358 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 0  |a 1  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |e VerfasserIn  |0 (DE-588)1216510156  |0 (DE-627)1727713036  |4 aut  |a Kvandal, Halvor 
109 |a Kvandal, Halvor 
245 1 4 |a The god-faculty dilemma  |b challenges for reformed epistemology in the light of cognitive science 
264 1 |c 2020 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a Reformed epistemology (RE) involves a view of knowledge of God which Kelly James Clark and Justin Barrett have brought cognitive science to bear on. They argue that the cognitive science of religion (CSR) indicates that we have a ‘god-faculty’, a notion employed by Alvin Plantinga. Plantinga contends that if there is a God, then we have a specialized god-faculty. Clark and Barrett, by contrast, focus on the empirical evidence and point to a different, less specialized faculty. This difference is significant for how RE and CSR relate. The paper argues that a dilemma arises for those who bring RE and CSR together. A choice must be made between two interpretations of the god-faculty. ‘God-faculty 1ʹ is a specialized system for forming theistic beliefs. Findings in CSR indicate that there is no such system. ‘God-faculty 2ʹ is an unrefined tendency to form beliefs in superhuman agents. This thesis has empirical support in CSR. However, this faculty is unable to deliver the epistemic goods needed for the immediate, non-inferential knowledge of God RE describes. This shows that those who combine central contentions in RE with current research in CSR face a dilemma from which it is hard to escape. 
601 |a Dilemma 
601 |a Challenger 
650 4 |a God 
650 4 |a HADD 
650 4 |a Reformed Epistemology 
650 4 |a Cognitive Science 
650 4 |a Debunking 
650 4 |a Evolution 
652 |a AE:CF:NBC 
689 0 0 |d s  |0 (DE-588)4193780-6  |0 (DE-627)105224596  |0 (DE-576)21008961X  |2 gnd  |a Kognitionswissenschaft 
689 0 1 |d s  |0 (DE-588)4049396-9  |0 (DE-627)106187155  |0 (DE-576)209081880  |2 gnd  |a Religion 
689 0 2 |d s  |0 (DE-588)4048507-9  |0 (DE-627)106190458  |0 (DE-576)209078197  |2 gnd  |a Rationalität 
689 0 3 |d s  |0 (DE-588)4021662-7  |0 (DE-627)104649747  |0 (DE-576)208939261  |2 gnd  |a Gott 
689 0 |5 (DE-627) 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t International journal of philosophy and theology  |d Abingdon [u.a.] : Taylor & Francis, 2013  |g 81(2020), 4, Seite 404-422  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)731333985  |w (DE-600)2692945-4  |w (DE-576)381266621  |x 2169-2335  |7 nnns 
773 1 8 |g volume:81  |g year:2020  |g number:4  |g pages:404-422 
856 |u https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1080/21692327.2020.1753095?needAccess=true  |x unpaywall  |z Vermutlich kostenfreier Zugang  |h publisher [open (via crossref license)] 
856 4 0 |u https://doi.org/10.1080/21692327.2020.1753095  |x Resolving-System  |z kostenfrei 
951 |a AR 
ELC |a 1 
ITA |a 1  |t 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 3742441183 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1727712358 
LOK |0 005 20220304090630 
LOK |0 008 200825||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-Tue135  |c DE-627  |d DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 935   |a ixzs  |a ixzo 
LOK |0 936ln  |0 1442043024  |a AE 
LOK |0 936ln  |0 1442051507  |a NBC 
LOK |0 936ln  |0 144204389X  |a CF 
OAS |a 1 
ORI |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw 
REL |a 1 
STA 0 0 |a Cognitive science,Evolution,Evolution,God,God,Rationality,Religion,Religions,Religion,Religion in literature 
STB 0 0 |a Dieu,Dieu,Rationalité,Religion,Religions,Religion,Science cognitive,Évolution,Évolution 
STC 0 0 |a Ciencia cognitiva,Dios,Dios,Evolución,Racionalidad,Religión,Religión,Religión 
STD 0 0 |a Dio,Dio,Evoluzione,Razionalità,Religione,Religione,Religione,Scienza cognitiva 
STE 0 0 |a 宗教,宗教,理智,理性,神,神,上帝,上帝,认知科学,进化,演变 
STF 0 0 |a 宗教,宗教,理智,理性,神,神,上帝,上帝,認知科學,進化,演變 
STG 0 0 |a Ciência cognitiva,Deus,Deus,Evolução,Racionalidade,Religião,Religião 
STH 0 0 |a Бог (мотив),Бог,Когнитивистика,Рациональность,Религия (мотив),Религия,Эволюция 
STI 0 0 |a Γνωσιακή επιστήμη,Γνωστική επιστήμη,Εξέλιξη,Θεός (μοτίβο),Θεός,Θρησκεία (μοτίβο),Θρησκεία,Λογικότητα 
SUB |a REL 
SYE 0 0 |a Abstammung 
SYG 0 0 |a Kognitive Wissenschaft,Cognitive Science,Kognitionsforschung , Religion,Mystik,Mythologie , Playing God