A Trinitarian Metaphysics of Predestination and Human Freedom
According to Andrea Vestrucci, an oppositional framework governs the debate between free will and determinism, but Martin Luther upends this framework by a view of God that brings free will and determinism together. I argue that this debate is governed by an impersonal dialectic of fate vs. chance....
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Contributors: | |
Format: | Electronic Article |
Language: | English |
Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
Journals Online & Print: | |
Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
Published: |
Routledge
[2020]
|
In: |
Theology and science
Year: 2020, Volume: 18, Issue: 3, Pages: 383-390 |
RelBib Classification: | KAG Church history 1500-1648; Reformation; humanism; Renaissance NBC Doctrine of God NBE Anthropology VA Philosophy |
Further subjects: | B
Van Til
B Free Will B Paradox B cosmic personalism B Trinitarian Theology B Predestination |
Online Access: |
Volltext (Resolving-System) |
Summary: | According to Andrea Vestrucci, an oppositional framework governs the debate between free will and determinism, but Martin Luther upends this framework by a view of God that brings free will and determinism together. I argue that this debate is governed by an impersonal dialectic of fate vs. chance. However, a constructive Trinitarian theology could overcome this impersonal dialectic since the triune God is exhaustively personal. In addition, God’s relationship with creation is analogical, rather than dialectical. Within a Trinitarian framework, therefore, predestination secures human freedom because a personal God establishes the human personality and because divine and human causality vary directly, rather than inversely, within an analogical relationship. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1474-6719 |
Reference: | Kritik von "Recalibrating the Logic of Free Will with Martin Luther (2020)"
|
Contains: | Enthalten in: Theology and science
|
Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1080/14746700.2020.1786217 |