I Walk the Line: Comment on Mikael Leidenhag on Theistic Evolution and In℡ligent Design

Is theistic evolution (TE) a philosophically tenable position? Leidenhag argues in his article “The Blurred Line between Theistic Evolution and Intelligent Design” that it is not, since it, Leidenhag claims, espouses a view of divine action that he labels “natural divine causation” (NDC), which make...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Skogholt, Christoffer (Author)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Drawer...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Published: Wiley-Blackwell [2020]
In: Zygon
Year: 2020, Volume: 55, Issue: 3, Pages: 685-695
Standardized Subjects / Keyword chains:B Leidenhag, Mikael / Theism / Evolution / Intelligent design / Naturalism (Philosophy)
RelBib Classification:AB Philosophy of religion; criticism of religion; atheism
CB Christian life; spirituality
FA Theology
NBD Doctrine of Creation
Further subjects:B Philip Clayton
B Deborah Haarsma
B Theism
B Intelligent design
B Transcendence
B Thomas Aquinas
B Evolution
B Panentheism
B Arthur Peacocke
B religious naturalism
Online Access: Presumably Free Access
Volltext (Verlag)
Volltext (doi)

MARC

LEADER 00000caa a22000002 4500
001 1728065313
003 DE-627
005 20201009184330.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 200831s2020 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.1111/zygo.12631  |2 doi 
035 |a (DE-627)1728065313 
035 |a (DE-599)KXP1728065313 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 0  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |e VerfasserIn  |0 (DE-588)1216841772  |0 (DE-627)1728076641  |4 aut  |a Skogholt, Christoffer 
109 |a Skogholt, Christoffer 
245 1 0 |a I Walk the Line  |b Comment on Mikael Leidenhag on Theistic Evolution and In℡ligent Design 
264 1 |c [2020] 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a Is theistic evolution (TE) a philosophically tenable position? Leidenhag argues in his article “The Blurred Line between Theistic Evolution and Intelligent Design” that it is not, since it, Leidenhag claims, espouses a view of divine action that he labels “natural divine causation” (NDC), which makes God explanatory redundant. That is, in so far as TE does not invoke God as an additional cause alongside natural causes, it is untenable. Theistic evolutionists should therefore “reject NDC and affirm a more robust notion of divine agency.” However, this will, Leidenhag claims, have the effect that theistic evolutionists “will move their position significantly closer to Intelligent Design,” and so the line between TE and intelligent design is (or ought to be?) blurred. If successful, the criticism by Leidenhag would be bad news for theists who want to take science seriously and good news for those scientistic atheists according to whom there simply is no scientifically respectable way of combining theism and modern natural science in an overarching worldview. So, is TE stuck between a rock (of redundancy) and a hard place (of pseudo-science)? No, at least not due to the criticism offered by Leidenhag—but maybe religious naturalism is? 
650 4 |a Arthur Peacocke 
650 4 |a Deborah Haarsma 
650 4 |a Philip Clayton 
650 4 |a Thomas Aquinas 
650 4 |a Evolution 
650 4 |a Intelligent Design 
650 4 |a Panentheism 
650 4 |a religious naturalism 
650 4 |a Theism 
650 4 |a Transcendence 
652 |a AB:CB:FA:NBD 
689 0 0 |d p  |0 (DE-588)1060498367  |0 (DE-627)800122763  |0 (DE-576)41657422X  |2 gnd  |a Leidenhag, Mikael 
689 0 1 |d s  |0 (DE-588)4059729-5  |0 (DE-627)10614250X  |0 (DE-576)209131942  |2 gnd  |a Theismus 
689 0 2 |d s  |0 (DE-588)4071050-6  |0 (DE-627)106098691  |0 (DE-576)209182741  |2 gnd  |a Evolution 
689 0 3 |d s  |0 (DE-588)4787084-9  |0 (DE-627)391031899  |0 (DE-576)216393272  |2 gnd  |a Intelligent Design 
689 0 4 |d s  |0 (DE-588)4171303-5  |0 (DE-627)105395846  |0 (DE-576)209936037  |2 gnd  |a Naturalismus  |g Philosophie 
689 0 |5 (DE-627) 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t Zygon  |d Oxford : Wiley-Blackwell, 1966  |g 55(2020), 3, Seite 685-695  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)300593570  |w (DE-600)1482903-4  |w (DE-576)090854799  |x 1467-9744  |7 nnns 
773 1 8 |g volume:55  |g year:2020  |g number:3  |g pages:685-695 
856 |u https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdfdirect/10.1111/zygo.12631  |x unpaywall  |z Vermutlich kostenfreier Zugang  |h publisher [open (via crossref license)] 
856 4 0 |u https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/zygo.12631  |x Verlag 
856 |u https://doi.org/10.1111/zygo.12631  |x doi  |3 Volltext 
936 u w |d 55  |j 2020  |e 3  |h 685-695 
951 |a AR 
ELC |a 1 
ITA |a 1  |t 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 3744614204 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1728065313 
LOK |0 005 20201009184330 
LOK |0 008 200831||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-Tue135  |c DE-627  |d DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 935   |a ixzs  |a ixzo 
LOK |0 936ln  |0 1442042990  |a AB 
LOK |0 936ln  |0 1442043768  |a CB 
LOK |0 936ln  |0 1442044020  |a FA 
LOK |0 936ln  |0 1442051531  |a NBD 
OAS |a 1 
ORI |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw 
REL |a 1 
STA 0 0 |a Evolution,Evolution,Intelligent design,ID,Neo-creationism,Intelligent design theory,Theism 
STB 0 0 |a Dessein intelligent,Théisme,Évolution,Évolution 
STC 0 0 |a Diseño inteligente,Evolución,Teísmo 
STD 0 0 |a Disegno intelligente,Evoluzione,Teismo 
STE 0 0 |a 有神论,进化,演变 
STF 0 0 |a 有神論,進化,演變 
STG 0 0 |a Desenho inteligente,Evolução,Teísmo 
STH 0 0 |a Интеллегентный дизайн,Теизм,Эволюция 
STI 0 0 |a Εξέλιξη,Ευφυής σχεδιασμός,Θεϊσμός 
SUB |a REL 
SYE 0 0 |a Abstammung , Intelligent-Design-Theorie,Neo-Kreationismus,ID,Intelligent Design-Theorie,IDTh 
SYG 0 0 |a Abstammung , Intelligent-Design-Theorie,Neo-Kreationismus,ID,Intelligent Design-Theorie,IDTh