Strategic tangles: slavery, colonial policy, and religion in German East Africa, 1885-1918

When Germany occupied Tanganyika in 1889, the mobilising rhetoric was built around ending slavery, which in turn was framed religiously, as a "Muslim" institution to be ended by "Christian civilisation." However, while the German colonisers subsequently suppressed slave-raiding a...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Haustein, Jörg 1975- (Author)
Format: Print Article
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Published: Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group 2019
In: German entanglements in transatlantic slavery
Year: 2019, Pages: 79-100

MARC

LEADER 00000caa a2200000 4500
001 172809741X
003 DE-627
005 20210914113611.0
007 tu
008 200831s2019 xx ||||| 00| ||eng c
020 |a 9781138311510 
035 |a (DE-627)172809741X 
035 |a (DE-599)KXP172809741X 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 0  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |e VerfasserIn  |0 (DE-588)185996949  |0 (DE-627)672427729  |0 (DE-576)352887885  |4 aut  |a Haustein, Jörg  |d 1975- 
109 |a Haustein, Jörg 1975- 
245 1 0 |a Strategic tangles  |b slavery, colonial policy, and religion in German East Africa, 1885-1918  |c Jörg Haustein 
264 1 |c 2019 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen  |b n  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Band  |b nc  |2 rdacarrier 
500 |a Bibliografie: Seite 97-100 
520 |a When Germany occupied Tanganyika in 1889, the mobilising rhetoric was built around ending slavery, which in turn was framed religiously, as a "Muslim" institution to be ended by "Christian civilisation." However, while the German colonisers subsequently suppressed slave-raiding and the large-scale slave trade, they never abolished slavery itself or the private sale of slaves. Moreover, the political utility of framing slavery as an "Islamic" practice quickly faded as the German government rested its political rule on the established Omani and Swahili Muslim elites and their economic networks. Settlers and planters, in turn, were soon discussing how to solve the problem of labour shortage by coercive means. Only missionaries had an interest to continue framing slavery as a Muslim practice in order to raise support for their Chtistianising endeavours. This led to an extended conflict about German colonial policy, in which settlers invoked Islam as an ally for "civilising" Africans for modern labour regimes, while missionaries continued to highlight slavery as an aspect of the "Islamic danger" in the colony. The essay traces the German debate of slavery in East Africa with a special interest in how it was connected to perceptions of Christianity and Islam. It demonstrates that the vicissitudes of the debate about slavery were not so much governed by the issue of slavery itself as by entangled strategic interests in the colonial nexus of politics, economy, and religion. 
601 |a Strategie 
601 |a Religion 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t German entanglements in transatlantic slavery  |d London : Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group, 2019  |g (2019), Seite 79-100  |h ix, 151 Seiten  |w (DE-627)1645880478  |w (DE-576)518135578  |z 9780367586744  |z 9781138311510  |7 nnnm 
773 1 8 |g year:2019  |g pages:79-100 
951 |a AR 
ELC |b 1 
ORI |a SA-MARC-ixtheo_oa001.raw 
REL |a 1 
SUB |a REL