Collective Continuity and Ontological Responsibility: Contesting the Pragmatic Approach in Ascribing Responsibility to Groups
The present paper challenges the view, rooted in the argument that groups lack a mind in the Davidsonian sense, that collective responsibility may be assessed mainly according to pragmatic criteria. I argue in favour of a kind of mental web of holistic collective attitudes and mindsets in the weak s...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Electronic Article |
Language: | English |
Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
Journals Online & Print: | |
Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
Published: |
Peeters
[2019]
|
In: |
Ethical perspectives
Year: 2019, Volume: 26, Issue: 4, Pages: 583-621 |
Standardized Subjects / Keyword chains: | B
Poles
/ Collective
/ Responsibility
/ Crime
/ Past
/ Group identity
|
RelBib Classification: | KBK Europe (East) NCD Political ethics TA History VA Philosophy ZD Psychology |
Online Access: |
Volltext (Resolving-System) |