Eustratius of Nicaea, a Theologian: About the Recent Publications of Alexei Barmin
Being the most prominent philosopher and theologian of his epoch (late 11th-early 12th cent.), Eustratius of Nicaea provoked important theological discussions in the fields of both Christology and Triadology. He was eventually condemned (1117) for his Christological views, but his Triadology faced a...
| Auteur principal: | |
|---|---|
| Type de support: | Électronique Review |
| Langue: | Anglais |
| Vérifier la disponibilité: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | En cours de chargement...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Publié: |
Brill
[2020]
|
| Dans: |
Scrinium
Année: 2020, Volume: 16, Numéro: 1, Pages: 344-358 |
| RelBib Classification: | KAE Moyen Âge central KDF Église orthodoxe NBC Dieu NBF Christologie VA Philosophie |
| Sujets non-standardisés: | B
Filioque
B Compte-rendu de lecture B Nicetas Seides B Nicetas “of Maroneia” B Nicholas Mouzalon B paraconsistent logic B Eustratius of Nicaea |
| Accès en ligne: |
Volltext (Verlag) Volltext (doi) |
| Résumé: | Being the most prominent philosopher and theologian of his epoch (late 11th-early 12th cent.), Eustratius of Nicaea provoked important theological discussions in the fields of both Christology and Triadology. He was eventually condemned (1117) for his Christological views, but his Triadology faced a strong opposition as well. His Byzantine opponents unfavourable to the Latins rejected his logically consistent approach to the Trinity and developed their own non-consistent (paraconsistent) approach, whereas his 13th-century latinophrone opponent Nicetas “of Maroneia” demonstrated that Eustratius’s logically consistent Triadology is more naturally compatible with the Filioque. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 1817-7565 |
| Contient: | Enthalten in: Scrinium
|
| Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1163/18177565-00160A07 |