A Hermeneutic for and from Reading Kierkegaard’s For Self-Examination
This essay provides a close reading of Kierkegaard’s later signed text, For Self-Examination. While many of Kierkegaard’s pseudonymous texts often are selected for their philosophically explicit engagements with Hegelian philosophy, I use Hegel’s dialectic of lordship and bondage to draw out how Kie...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Electronic Article |
Language: | English |
Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
Journals Online & Print: | |
Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
Published: |
MDPI
[2020]
|
In: |
Religions
Year: 2020, Volume: 11, Issue: 10 |
Further subjects: | B
Kierkegaard
B Lutheranism B Hegel B Subjectivity B lordship and bondage dialectic B self-examination |
Online Access: |
Presumably Free Access Volltext (Verlag) Volltext (doi) |
MARC
LEADER | 00000caa a22000002 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | 1736642286 | ||
003 | DE-627 | ||
005 | 20210127105421.0 | ||
007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
008 | 201027s2020 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
024 | 7 | |a 10.3390/rel11100491 |2 doi | |
035 | |a (DE-627)1736642286 | ||
035 | |a (DE-599)KXP1736642286 | ||
040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rda | ||
041 | |a eng | ||
084 | |a 1 |a 0 |2 ssgn | ||
100 | 1 | |a Dickman, Nathan Eric |e VerfasserIn |4 aut | |
245 | 1 | 2 | |a A Hermeneutic for and from Reading Kierkegaard’s For Self-Examination |
264 | 1 | |c [2020] | |
336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
520 | |a This essay provides a close reading of Kierkegaard’s later signed text, For Self-Examination. While many of Kierkegaard’s pseudonymous texts often are selected for their philosophically explicit engagements with Hegelian philosophy, I use Hegel’s dialectic of lordship and bondage to draw out how Kierkegaard circumvents it in this one. I first provide historical context, noting how Kierkegaard turned to earnest works after his public humiliation in the Copenhagen newspaper, undermining his ability to deploy irony effectively. Second, I briefly develop Hegel’s lordship and bondage dialectic as a model for how selfhood is constituted through work and labor. Third, I dwell with a close reading of Kierkegaard’s book both in its composition and in its interpretation, bringing out how it donates grace rather than work (à la Hegel) to the reader’s attempt at self-realization. I conclude by noting one challenge to Kierkegaard’s ideal of addressing the “single individual” from the perspective of intersectional analysis. | ||
601 | |a Hermeneutik | ||
650 | 4 | |a Hegel | |
650 | 4 | |a Kierkegaard | |
650 | 4 | |a Lutheranism | |
650 | 4 | |a lordship and bondage dialectic | |
650 | 4 | |a self-examination | |
650 | 4 | |a Subjectivity | |
773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Religions |d Basel : MDPI, 2010 |g 11(2020,10) Artikel 491 |h Online-Ressource |w (DE-627)665435797 |w (DE-600)2620962-7 |w (DE-576)348219067 |x 2077-1444 |7 nnns |
773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:11 |g year:2020 |g number:10 |
856 | |u https://www.mdpi.com/2077-1444/11/10/491/pdf?version=1601196933 |x unpaywall |z Vermutlich kostenfreier Zugang |h publisher [oa journal (via doaj)] | ||
856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://www.mdpi.com/2077-1444/11/10/491 |x Verlag |
856 | |u https://doi.org/10.3390/rel11100491 |x doi |3 Volltext | ||
951 | |a AR | ||
ELC | |a 1 | ||
LOK | |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 | ||
LOK | |0 001 378663467X | ||
LOK | |0 003 DE-627 | ||
LOK | |0 004 1736642286 | ||
LOK | |0 005 20201027081635 | ||
LOK | |0 008 201027||||||||||||||||ger||||||| | ||
LOK | |0 040 |a DE-Tue135 |c DE-627 |d DE-Tue135 | ||
LOK | |0 092 |o n | ||
LOK | |0 852 |a DE-Tue135 | ||
LOK | |0 852 1 |9 00 | ||
LOK | |0 935 |a ixzs |a ixzo | ||
OAS | |a 1 | ||
ORI | |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw | ||
REL | |a 1 | ||
SUB | |a REL |