Chastening and Disciplining Comparison: Bruce Lincoln and Oliver Freiberger on the Comparative Method in the Study of Religion
The article reviews two recent books on comparison in the study of religion authored by prominent scholars. Long out of vogue, comparison now must be defended as a or even the central methodology for religious studies. Both philology and critical theory have collaborated to undermine the universalis...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Contributors: | ; |
Format: | Electronic Review |
Language: | English |
Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
Journals Online & Print: | |
Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
Published: |
Brill
[2020]
|
In: |
Method & theory in the study of religion
Year: 2020, Volume: 32, Issue: 4/5, Pages: 482-490 |
Review of: | Apples and oranges (Chicago : The University of Chicago Press, 2018) (Yelle, Robert A.)
Considering comparison (New York, NY : Oxford University Press, 2019) (Yelle, Robert A.) |
RelBib Classification: | AA Study of religion |
Further subjects: | B
Book review
B Comparison B Religious Studies B Oliver Freiberger B Bruce Lincoln |
Online Access: |
Volltext (Verlag) Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
Summary: | The article reviews two recent books on comparison in the study of religion authored by prominent scholars. Long out of vogue, comparison now must be defended as a or even the central methodology for religious studies. Both philology and critical theory have collaborated to undermine the universalist assumptions on which earlier grand comparisons in the study of religion based themselves. The question is whether the two books considered here manage to rescue comparison from its critics. My reading here suggests that a more robust defense may be needed. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1570-0682 |
Reference: | Kritik in "Comparison Considered (2020)"
Kritik in "By Way of Response (2020)" |
Contains: | Enthalten in: Method & theory in the study of religion
|
Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1163/15700682-12341491 |