Notable Luther and Melanchthon: An Annotated Copy of Luther’s Confitendi ratio
This article addresses an unusual case of annotation in an early Luther imprint. Drew University Library (Madison, NJ, USA) owns a copy of Luther’s Confitendi ratio (Wittenberg, 1520) that, according to the Library catalog, “is heavily annotated in a contemporary hand.” The present article identifie...
| Auteurs: | ; |
|---|---|
| Type de support: | Électronique Article |
| Langue: | Anglais |
| Vérifier la disponibilité: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | En cours de chargement...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Publié: |
Routledge, Taylor and Francis Group
[2020]
|
| Dans: |
Reformation
Année: 2020, Volume: 25, Numéro: 2, Pages: 117-130 |
| RelBib Classification: | KAG Réforme; humanisme; Renaissance KDD Église protestante NBP Sacrements ZG Sociologie des médias; médias numériques; Sciences de l'information et de la communication |
| Sujets non-standardisés: | B
Latomus controversy
B Confession B Marginalia B Melanchthon B Luther B Kommunikationsprozess |
| Accès en ligne: |
Volltext (Resolving-System) |
| Résumé: | This article addresses an unusual case of annotation in an early Luther imprint. Drew University Library (Madison, NJ, USA) owns a copy of Luther’s Confitendi ratio (Wittenberg, 1520) that, according to the Library catalog, “is heavily annotated in a contemporary hand.” The present article identifies the sources of these annotations and offers some suggestions about the identity of the annotator, as well as some suggestions about the possible reasons or uses for these annotations. It also reflects on the function of annotations in the Kommunikationsprozess. The article suggests that the annotations in this book may have some connection with the Latomus Controversy that engaged Luther and other Reformers in the early 1520s. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 1752-0738 |
| Contient: | Enthalten in: Reformation
|
| Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1080/13574175.2020.1824707 |