A New Religion Fights for Peace: The Case of the Quakers in Korea

The historical perception of the Society of Friends, commonly called Quakers, as a fringe element in the seventeenth century Puritan movement, as well as its presence and active engagement with the Korean government over issues of peace, pacifism, and conscientious objection,...

Description complète

Enregistré dans:  
Détails bibliographiques
Publié dans:The journal of CESNUR
Auteur principal: Melton, J. Gordon 1942- (Auteur)
Type de support: Électronique Article
Langue:Anglais
Vérifier la disponibilité: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
En cours de chargement...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Publié: [2020]
Dans: The journal of CESNUR
Année: 2020, Volume: 4, Numéro: 5, Pages: 27-41
Sujets / Chaînes de mots-clés standardisés:B Korea / Quakers / Nouvelles religions / Mouvement pacifiste
RelBib Classification:AD Sociologie des religions
AZ Nouveau mouvement religieux
KBM Asie
KDH Sectes d’origine chrétienne
Sujets non-standardisés:B Quakers
B Peace Movements
B New Religious Movements (Definition)
B New Religions (Definition)
B Pacifism
B Conscientious Objection
B Religion in South Korea
Accès en ligne: Volltext (Resolving-System)
Description
Résumé:The historical perception of the Society of Friends, commonly called Quakers, as a fringe element in the seventeenth century Puritan movement, as well as its presence and active engagement with the Korean government over issues of peace, pacifism, and conscientious objection, raise the question of both the religion’s status in Korea and what in scholarly discourse is called a new religion. The article discusses the definition of new religions (aka new religious movements), herein defined as religious groups that exist with neither social nor cultural continuity with the dominant religion(s) of whatever culture they may be found in. Given that definition, Quakers are found to be a new religion in Korea.
ISSN:2532-2990
Contient:Enthalten in: The journal of CESNUR
Persistent identifiers:DOI: 10.26338/tjoc.2020.4.5.2