Sekularingseringstesen i religionssociologien
Secularization has been á major issue in sociological debates on religion. Recent developments in theory as well as in social reality seems to indicate that the future for the seularization thesis will not be as glorious as the past. The main argument in this article is that the secularization thesi...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Electronic Article |
| Language: | Danish |
| Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Drawer...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Published: |
Univ.
[1999]
|
| In: |
Religionsvidenskabeligt tidsskrift
Year: 1999, Volume: 35, Pages: 43-60 |
| Further subjects: | B
Sekularisering
B Religionssociologi |
| Online Access: |
Volltext (doi) Volltext (kostenfrei) |
MARC
| LEADER | 00000caa a22000002 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | 1743266707 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20230707142623.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 201218s1999 xx |||||o 00| ||dan c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.7146/rt.v0i35.2642 |2 doi | |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)1743266707 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)KXP1743266707 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rda | ||
| 041 | |a dan | ||
| 084 | |a 0 |2 ssgn | ||
| 100 | 1 | |e VerfasserIn |0 (DE-588)1052597912 |0 (DE-627)788757598 |0 (DE-576)256657203 |4 aut |a Kühle, Lene |d 1971- | |
| 109 | |a Kühle, Lene 1971- |a Aa Kühle, Lene M. van der 1971- |a Kühle, Lene M. van der 1971- | ||
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Sekularingseringstesen i religionssociologien |
| 264 | 1 | |c [1999] | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 520 | |a Secularization has been á major issue in sociological debates on religion. Recent developments in theory as well as in social reality seems to indicate that the future for the seularization thesis will not be as glorious as the past. The main argument in this article is that the secularization thesis, which can more properly be understood as a paradigm in the Kuhnian sense, is no longer a very useful frame for the sociological study of religion. This argument is supported by three examples from the contemporay political sphere, where the description in terms of "secularization" seems to lead to ambiguous conclusions. The article gives a brief presentation of two candidates for a new paradigm and discusses the requirements that the new paradigm is expected to meet. Whether any of these paradigms or perhaps a completely different one is going to assume the position as the dominant paradigm in the sociology of religion is still to be seen. | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a Religionssociologi | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Sekularisering | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Religionsvidenskabeligt tidsskrift |d Århus : Univ., 1982 |g 35(1999), Seite 43-60 |h Online-Ressource |w (DE-627)684969882 |w (DE-600)2649785-2 |w (DE-576)358413109 |x 1904-8181 |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:35 |g year:1999 |g pages:43-60 |
| 856 | |u https://tidsskrift.dk/rvt/article/download/2642/2290 |x unpaywall |z Vermutlich kostenfreier Zugang |h publisher [open (via free pdf)] | ||
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://tidsskrift.dk/rvt/article/view/2642 |x Verlag |z kostenfrei |3 Volltext |
| 856 | |u https://doi.org/10.7146/rt.v0i35.2642 |x doi |3 Volltext | ||
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| ELC | |a 1 | ||
| LOK | |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 | ||
| LOK | |0 001 3827127114 | ||
| LOK | |0 003 DE-627 | ||
| LOK | |0 004 1743266707 | ||
| LOK | |0 005 20201218140644 | ||
| LOK | |0 008 201218||||||||||||||||ger||||||| | ||
| LOK | |0 040 |a DE-Tue135 |c DE-627 |d DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 092 |o n | ||
| LOK | |0 852 |a DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 852 1 |9 00 | ||
| LOK | |0 935 |a ixzs |a ixzo |a rwrk | ||
| OAS | |a 1 | ||
| ORI | |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw | ||
| REL | |a 1 | ||
| SUB | |a REL | ||