Renhed, ritual og samfund hos Mary Douglas

“Purity, Ritual and Society According to Mary Douglas: A problematization inspired by some recent post-structuralist critiques”. Mary Douglas’ two pioneering books, Purity and Danger and Natural Symbols, were together a major break-through in the study of religions. Today, when post-structuralist vo...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Aktor, Mikael 1949- (Author)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:Danish
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Drawer...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Published: Univ. [1997]
In: Religionsvidenskabeligt tidsskrift
Year: 1997, Volume: 31, Pages: 5-26
Further subjects:B Mary Douglas
B Renhed
Online Access: Volltext (doi)
Volltext (kostenfrei)

MARC

LEADER 00000caa a22000002 4500
001 1743272154
003 DE-627
005 20230707140645.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 201218s1997 xx |||||o 00| ||dan c
024 7 |a 10.7146/rt.v0i31.3853  |2 doi 
035 |a (DE-627)1743272154 
035 |a (DE-599)KXP1743272154 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a dan 
084 |a 0  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |e VerfasserIn  |0 (DE-588)1103238256  |0 (DE-627)860841669  |0 (DE-576)325541809  |4 aut  |a Aktor, Mikael  |d 1949- 
109 |a Aktor, Mikael 1949- 
245 1 0 |a Renhed, ritual og samfund hos Mary Douglas 
264 1 |c [1997] 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a “Purity, Ritual and Society According to Mary Douglas: A problematization inspired by some recent post-structuralist critiques”. Mary Douglas’ two pioneering books, Purity and Danger and Natural Symbols, were together a major break-through in the study of religions. Today, when post-structuralist voices are heard more and more clearly, also in this discipline, it is, however, time for a rethinking of her hypotheses. The present article attempts particularly to account for two such critiques. One is the objection against the linguistic paradigm and specially against its separation between thought and act, meaning and ritual. On the basis of the criticisms of Talal Asad, Catherine Bell and others (and referring back to philosophy of language) purity is instead seen as a felicity condition of ritual action, practice or agency. The other critique is based on phenomenology of perception and is directed at the fundamental distinction in Douglas’ social symbolism between an undifferentiated experience and a conceptual ordering. This distinction is a misrepresentation of Gestalt psychology according to Ariel Glucklich who, instead, develops a phenomenological definition of purity as ‘resonance’ between the ritual’s mythical narrative and the sensory experience of its performance. 
601 |a Douglas, Mary 
650 4 |a Mary Douglas 
650 4 |a Renhed 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t Religionsvidenskabeligt tidsskrift  |d Århus : Univ., 1982  |g 31(1997), Seite 5-26  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)684969882  |w (DE-600)2649785-2  |w (DE-576)358413109  |x 1904-8181  |7 nnns 
773 1 8 |g volume:31  |g year:1997  |g pages:5-26 
856 |u https://tidsskrift.dk/rvt/article/download/3853/3356  |x unpaywall  |z Vermutlich kostenfreier Zugang  |h publisher [open (via free pdf)] 
856 4 0 |u https://tidsskrift.dk/rvt/article/view/3853  |x Verlag  |z kostenfrei  |3 Volltext 
856 |u https://doi.org/10.7146/rt.v0i31.3853  |x doi  |3 Volltext 
951 |a AR 
ELC |a 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 3827155754 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1743272154 
LOK |0 005 20201218144905 
LOK |0 008 201218||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-Tue135  |c DE-627  |d DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 935   |a ixzs  |a ixzo  |a rwrk 
OAS |a 1 
ORI |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw 
REL |a 1 
SUB |a REL