From Gnosticism to Agnotology: a reply to Robertson and Talmont-Kaminski
This paper is a reply to the commentaries by David G. Robertson and Konrad Talmont-Kaminski on An Unnatural History of Religions: Academia, Post-truth and the Quest for Scientific Knowledge (2019) and published in this same issue of Religio: Revue pro religionistiku. Topics discussed herein include:...
| 1. VerfasserIn: | |
|---|---|
| Medienart: | Elektronisch Aufsatz |
| Sprache: | Englisch |
| Verfügbarkeit prüfen: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Lade...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Veröffentlicht: |
Společnost
[2020]
|
| In: |
Religio
Jahr: 2020, Band: 28, Heft: 1, Seiten: [37]-44 |
| weitere Schlagwörter: | B
Agnotology
B Religious Studies B History and Philosophy of Science B Cognitive Historiography B Pseudoscience B history of religions |
| Online Zugang: |
Volltext (kostenfrei) Volltext (kostenfrei) |
| Zusammenfassung: | This paper is a reply to the commentaries by David G. Robertson and Konrad Talmont-Kaminski on An Unnatural History of Religions: Academia, Post-truth and the Quest for Scientific Knowledge (2019) and published in this same issue of Religio: Revue pro religionistiku. Topics discussed herein include: the need for a consilient and cross-disciplinary research programme for cognitive historiography; pseudoscience in Religious Studies; the epistemological study of disciplinary ignorance-making (or Agnotology); and cross- and inter-disciplinary proposals to support an overhaul of the field's method and theory (i.e., Virtue Epistemology, Virtue Ethics, Philosophy of Expertise, Management Studies, Evolutionary Epistemology, Cognitive Historiography, History and Philosophy of Science). |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 2336-4475 |
| Bezug: | Kommentar zu "The cognitive science of the history of science (2020)"
Kommentar zu ""When the chips are down" (2020)" |
| Enthält: | Enthalten in: Religio
|
| Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.5817/Rel2020-1-4 |