Why the possible is not impossible but is unlikely: a response to our colleagues
This paper is a response to the responses to our paper "Religious Studies as a Scientific Discipline: The Persistence of a Delusion" by Hans Gerald Hödl, Hubert Seiwert, Radek Kundt, Tomáš Bubík, and Kocku von Stuckrad, published in this same issue of Religio: Revue pro religionistiku. Som...
Authors: | ; |
---|---|
Format: | Electronic Article |
Language: | English |
Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
Journals Online & Print: | |
Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
Published: |
Společnost
[2012]
|
In: |
Religio
Year: 2012, Volume: 20, Issue: 1, Pages: [63]-72 |
Further subjects: | B
Religious Studies
B history of the study of religion B cognitive science of religion B religious concerns |
Online Access: |
Volltext (kostenfrei) |