Descent from the peak: mystical navigations of paradox and trauma on the down-climb
The literature on ‘mountain mysticism’ includes a wide array of interpretations: Reductively, mystical states experienced on mountains may be viewed as neurological or psychological epiphenomena. Anthropomorphised as mystical agents themselves, the mountain is seen as capable of engendering non-ordi...
| Publié dans: | Culture and religion |
|---|---|
| Auteur principal: | |
| Type de support: | Électronique Article |
| Langue: | Anglais |
| Vérifier la disponibilité: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | En cours de chargement...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Publié: |
Taylor and Francis Group
2020
|
| Dans: |
Culture and religion
|
| Sujets / Chaînes de mots-clés standardisés: | B
Muir, John 1838-1914
/ Ramaṇa, Mahārṣi 1879-1950
/ Schultheis, Rob 1943-
/ Montagne
/ Abstiegsroute
/ Mysticisme
|
| RelBib Classification: | AF Géographie religieuse AG Vie religieuse ZB Sociologie ZD Psychologie |
| Sujets non-standardisés: | B
Mountains
B Ramana Maharshi B NATURE MYSTICISM B John Muir B Mystical Experience |
| Accès en ligne: |
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
| Résumé: | The literature on ‘mountain mysticism’ includes a wide array of interpretations: Reductively, mystical states experienced on mountains may be viewed as neurological or psychological epiphenomena. Anthropomorphised as mystical agents themselves, the mountain is seen as capable of engendering non-ordinary awareness. This article makes space for interpretations falling outside of or combining such constructivist and universalised interpretations by first examining what ontological interpolations may be available after ‘the peak has been reached.’ I track the mystic’s descent ‘back’ to ordinary consciousness as a pivotal determinative moment in the narrative construction of mystical noesis. I consider three examples of 19th and 20th century nature mysticisms (naturalist John Muir, Vedantic sage Ramana Maharshi, journalist Rob Schultheis) to illustrate my assertion that it is the mystic’s grappling with the paradox inherent in the ontological trauma of descent which performs the pivotal negotiation between the collapsed boundaries of subject/object or self/Other that characterizes mystical experience. I suggest further that we look to this narrative grappling as inevitably determining the content of the experience of noesis itself. Rather than reasserting a radical constructivism, I point more specifically to ‘descent’ as one juncture in which a remarkable ontological agency directly engages with the mystic’s moment of self-construal. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 1475-5629 |
| Contient: | Enthalten in: Culture and religion
|
| Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1080/14755610.2020.1858551 |