Transformation or Rediscovery? Soteriological and Cosmological Themes in the Lotus Sutra and the Philokalic Tradition
The goal of this paper is to begin a conversation between the speculative vision of the Lotus Sutra and the life of devotion it inspires, on the one hand, and the theological and spiritual tradition of the Philokalia, on the other. The purpose of this dialogue is to highlight the points of contact b...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Electronic Article |
| Language: | English |
| Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Drawer...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Published: |
University of Hawaii Press
[2020]
|
| In: |
Buddhist Christian studies
Year: 2020, Volume: 40, Pages: 63-78 |
| Standardized Subjects / Keyword chains: | B
Origenes 185-254, Philocalia
/ Evagrius, Ponticus 345-399
/ Cosmology
/ Redemption
/ Council (451 : Chalkedon)
/ Incarnation of Jesus Christ
/ Tipiṭaka. Suttapiṭaka. Saddharmapuṇḍarīka-sūtra
/ Buddhahood
|
| RelBib Classification: | BL Buddhism KAB Church history 30-500; early Christianity NBK Soteriology |
| Further subjects: | B
Tathāgata
B Deification B Philokalia B Christology B Evagrios B conventional and ultimate reality B skillful means B Nous B Buddha nature (Buddhahood) B Chalcedon |
| Online Access: |
Volltext (Verlag) Volltext (doi) |
MARC
| LEADER | 00000caa a22000002 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | 1744332622 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20220325131026.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 210111s2020 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1353/bcs.2020.0004 |2 doi | |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)1744332622 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)KXP1744332622 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rda | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 084 | |a 0 |2 ssgn | ||
| 100 | 1 | |e VerfasserIn |0 (DE-588)1052301665 |0 (DE-627)788287745 |0 (DE-576)408060190 |4 aut |a Cattoi, Thomas |d 1973- | |
| 109 | |a Cattoi, Thomas 1973- | ||
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Transformation or Rediscovery? Soteriological and Cosmological Themes in the Lotus Sutra and the Philokalic Tradition |
| 264 | 1 | |c [2020] | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 520 | |a The goal of this paper is to begin a conversation between the speculative vision of the Lotus Sutra and the life of devotion it inspires, on the one hand, and the theological and spiritual tradition of the Philokalia, on the other. The purpose of this dialogue is to highlight the points of contact between the notion of Buddhahood and devotional practice intimated in the Lotus Sutra and the soteriological thrust of certain currents of early Christian thought, such as the Origenist spiritual tradition of the fourth century. The first part of the paper outlines the cosmological and anthropological views of the school of Evagrios Pontikos (345-390), underscoring the centrality of the dialectic between unity and multiplicity, as well as the propaedeutic value of the mission of Christ against a stark contrast between undifferentiated noetic oneness and the plurality of material difference; this approach is then contrasted with the Chalcedonian understanding of the hypostatic union, where the uniqueness of the incarnation is the pivot of a redemptive pedagogy that ratifies and confirms the material order in all its specificity and contingency. The second part of the paper offers an overview of certain themes of the Lotus Sutra, such as the soteriological value of the Buddha nature, its different manifestations within the world of conventional reality, and its implications for devotional practice, as well as the "sacramental" understanding of the natural order. The paper argues that the vision of the Lotus Sutra appears to be in greater agreement with the soteriology and Christology developed by Evagrios than with the later developments, which followed the council of Chalcedon and emphasized the uniqueness and radical "otherness" of the incarnation of Christ. | ||
| 601 | |a Transformation | ||
| 601 | |a Soteriologie | ||
| 601 | |a Philokalia | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a Buddha nature (Buddhahood) | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Chalcedon | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Christology | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Evagrios | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Philokalia | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Tathāgata | |
| 650 | 4 | |a conventional and ultimate reality | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Deification | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Nous | |
| 650 | 4 | |a skillful means | |
| 652 | |a BL:KAB:NBK | ||
| 689 | 0 | 0 | |d u |0 (DE-588)4354531-2 |0 (DE-627)702602698 |0 (DE-576)21156026X |a Origenes |2 gnd |d 185-254 |t Philocalia |
| 689 | 0 | 1 | |d p |0 (DE-588)118682504 |0 (DE-627)079465390 |0 (DE-576)160889626 |2 gnd |a Evagrius |c Ponticus |d 345-399 |
| 689 | 0 | 2 | |d s |0 (DE-588)4114294-9 |0 (DE-627)105823236 |0 (DE-576)209483431 |2 gnd |a Kosmologie |
| 689 | 0 | 3 | |d s |0 (DE-588)4015317-4 |0 (DE-627)106337149 |0 (DE-576)20891126X |2 gnd |a Erlösung |
| 689 | 0 | 4 | |d f |0 (DE-588)2047219-5 |0 (DE-627)102931917 |0 (DE-576)191958670 |2 gnd |a Konzil |d 451 |c Chalkedon |
| 689 | 0 | 5 | |d s |0 (DE-588)1023789752 |0 (DE-627)718474155 |0 (DE-576)36744481X |2 gnd |a Inkarnation Jesu |
| 689 | 0 | 6 | |d u |0 (DE-588)4076944-6 |0 (DE-627)104312912 |0 (DE-576)209203552 |a Tipiṭaka |2 gnd |p Suttapiṭaka |p Saddharmapuṇḍarīka-sūtra |
| 689 | 0 | 7 | |d s |0 (DE-588)4242532-3 |0 (DE-627)104848871 |0 (DE-576)210446978 |2 gnd |a Buddha-Natur |
| 689 | 0 | |5 (DE-627) | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Buddhist Christian studies |d Honolulu, Hawaii : Univ. of Hawaii Press, 1981 |g 40(2020), Seite 63-78 |h Online-Ressource |w (DE-627)320470148 |w (DE-600)2008426-2 |w (DE-576)117648264 |x 1527-9472 |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:40 |g year:2020 |g pages:63-78 |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://muse.jhu.edu/article/775596 |x Verlag |
| 856 | |u https://doi.org/10.1353/bcs.2020.0004 |x doi |3 Volltext | ||
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| ELC | |a 1 | ||
| ITA | |a 1 |t 1 | ||
| LOK | |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 | ||
| LOK | |0 001 383426024X | ||
| LOK | |0 003 DE-627 | ||
| LOK | |0 004 1744332622 | ||
| LOK | |0 005 20210706091345 | ||
| LOK | |0 008 210111||||||||||||||||ger||||||| | ||
| LOK | |0 040 |a DE-Tue135 |c DE-627 |d DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 092 |o n | ||
| LOK | |0 852 |a DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 852 1 |9 00 | ||
| LOK | |0 935 |a ixzs |a ixzo | ||
| LOK | |0 936ln |0 1442043644 |a BL | ||
| LOK | |0 936ln |0 1442044284 |a KAB | ||
| LOK | |0 936ln |0 1442052325 |a NBK | ||
| ORI | |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw | ||
| REL | |a 1 | ||
| STA | 0 | 0 | |a Buddhahood,Cosmology,Cosmology,Incarnation of Jesus Christ,Incarnation of Jesus,Incarnation of Christ,Jesus Christ,Incarnation,Philokalia,Philocalia,Redemption,Redemption,Salvation,Tathāgata |
| STB | 0 | 0 | |a Cosmologie,Cosmologie,Incarnation de Jésus,Nature de Bouddha,Philocalie,Rédemption,Rédemption,Tathāgata |
| STC | 0 | 0 | |a Cosmología,Cosmología,Encarnación de Jesús,Filocalía,Naturaleza de buda,Redención,Redención,Tathagata |
| STD | 0 | 0 | |a Cosmologia,Cosmologia,Filocalia,Incarnazione di Gesù,Natura del Buddha,Redenzione,Redenzione,Tathāgata |
| STE | 0 | 0 | |a 宇宙论,宇宙论,宇宙哲学,宇宙哲学,救赎,救赎,解放,拯救,解放,拯救,爱慕集,对神荣美的爱 |
| STF | 0 | 0 | |a 佛性,宇宙論,宇宙論,宇宙哲學,宇宙哲學,愛慕集,對神榮美的愛,救贖,救贖,解放,拯救,解放,拯救 |
| STG | 0 | 0 | |a Cosmologia,Cosmologia,Encarnação de Jesus,Filocalia,Natureza de buda,Redenção,Redenção,Tathagata |
| STH | 0 | 0 | |a Воплощение христово,Добротолюбие,Космология (мотив),Космология,Природа Будды,Спасение (мотив),Спасение,Татхагата |
| STI | 0 | 0 | |a Ενσάρκωση του Ιησού,Κοσμολογία (μοτίβο),Κοσμολογία,Λύτρωση <μοτίβο>,Λύτρωση,Σωτηρία,Σωτηρία (μοτίβο),Τατάγκατα,Tathāgata,Φιλοκαλία,Φύση του Βούδα |
| SUB | |a REL | ||
| SYE | 0 | 0 | |a Dobrotoljubie |
| SYG | 0 | 0 | |a Basilius,Gregorius,Origenes,185-254,Ecloga de operibus Origenis a Basilio et Gregorio Nazianzeno facta,Origenes,185-254,Philocalia seu ecloga de operibus Origenis a Basilio et Gregorio Nazianzeno facta,Origenes,185-254,Philokalia,Origenes,185-254,Philokalie , Euagrios,aus dem Pontus,345-399,Ponticus, Evagrius,345-399,Evagrios,vom Pontos,345-399,Evagrios,Ponticos,345-399,Evagrios,Kirchenschriftsteller,345-399,Evagrius,Monachus Graecus,345-399,Evagrius,Scitis,345-399,Evagrius,Scriptor Ecclesiasticus,345-399,Evagrio,Pontico,345-399,Evagrius,von Pontus,345-399,Evagrius,Sanctus,345-399,Evagrij,Pontijskij,345-399,Pontijskij, Evagrij,345-399,Ewagr,Pontac̕i,345-399,Evagrios,Pontikos,345-399,Euagrios,Pontikos,345-399,Evagrius,of Pontus,345-399,Euagrius,Ponticus,345-399,Pontikos, Evagrios,345-399,Evagre,le Pontique,345-399 , Evolution,Weltall,Weltall,Weltall,Weltentstehung , Concilium Chalcedonense,451,Chalkedon,Concilium Universale Chalcedonense,451,Chalkedon,Concile de Chalcédoine,451,Chalkedon,Concilio di Calcedonia,451,Chalkedon,Council of Chalcedon,451,Chalkedon,Konzil von Chalcedon,451,Chalkedon,Konzil von Chalkedon,451,Chalkedon,Ökumenisches Konzil,4.,451,Chalkedon , Inkarnation Christi,Menschwerdung Jesu,Menschwerdung Christi , Lotus sūtra,Lotos-Sūtra,Fahuajing,Fa-hua-ching,Miaofa-lianhuajing,Miaofa lianhuajing,Miao-fa-lien-hua-ching,Hokkekyō,Hokekyō,Myōhōrengekyō,Myōhō rengekyō,Pŏphwagyŏng,Myobŏp-yŏnhwagyŏng,Myobŏp yŏnhwagyŏng,The lotus of the wonderful law,Lotus-sūtra,Saddharmapuṇḍarīka-sūtra,Saddharmapuṇḍarīka,Tripịtaka,Sūtrapịtaka,Saddharmapuṇḍarīkasūtra,Saddharmapuṇḍarīkasūtra,Lotus Sutra,Saddharma-Pundarīka Sūtra,Fa hua jing,Fa hua ching,Miao fa lien hua ching , Buddha-Wesen,Buddhatā,Foxing,Fo-hsing,Busshō |