Changing our perspective: Is there a government obligation to promote autonomy through the provision of public prenatal screening?

In many countries, prenatal testing for certain fetal abnormalities is offered via publicly funded screening programs. The concept of reproductive autonomy is regarded as providing a justificatory basis for many such programs. The purpose of this study is to re-examine the normative basis of public...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Authors: Enzo, Aya (Author) ; Asai, Atsushi (Author) ; Okita, Taketoshi (Author)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Drawer...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Published: Wiley-Blackwell [2021]
In: Bioethics
Year: 2021, Volume: 35, Issue: 1, Pages: 40-46
RelBib Classification:NCH Medical ethics
ZC Politics in general
Further subjects:B Rights
B Obligation
B government obligation
B prenatal testing
B Autonomy
B prenatal screening
Online Access: Presumably Free Access
Volltext (Verlag)
Volltext (doi)

MARC

LEADER 00000caa a22000002 4500
001 1744585016
003 DE-627
005 20211006150744.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 210113s2021 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.1111/bioe.12779  |2 doi 
035 |a (DE-627)1744585016 
035 |a (DE-599)KXP1744585016 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 1  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |a Enzo, Aya  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
245 1 0 |a Changing our perspective  |b Is there a government obligation to promote autonomy through the provision of public prenatal screening? 
264 1 |c [2021] 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a In many countries, prenatal testing for certain fetal abnormalities is offered via publicly funded screening programs. The concept of reproductive autonomy is regarded as providing a justificatory basis for many such programs. The purpose of this study is to re-examine the normative basis of public prenatal screening for fetal abnormalities by changing our perspective from that of autonomy to obligation. After clarifying the understanding of autonomy adopted in the justification for public prenatal screening programs, we identify two problems concerning this justification: first, the extent to which the government is obliged to meet this demand is not evident; and, second, it is not clear whether the provision of public screening is the most appropriate way to promote autonomy. Next, to tackle these problems, we focus on Onora O’Neill’s argument of rights and obligations. Drawing on this argument, we show that, in addressing the problems above, it is important to change our normative perspective from rights or autonomy to obligation. Our argument will show that since the government does not have an incontrovertibly fundamental obligation to promote autonomy, this obligation needs to be constrained in terms of compatibility with other fundamental obligations. In addition, even if a government is obliged to promote autonomy to some degree, there could be more appropriate means to achieve it than providing public prenatal screening; therefore, it is not necessary for government obligations to extend to the provision of public prenatal screening. 
601 |a Autonomie 
650 4 |a Autonomy 
650 4 |a government obligation 
650 4 |a Obligation 
650 4 |a prenatal screening 
650 4 |a prenatal testing 
650 4 |a Rights 
652 |a NCH:ZC 
700 1 |a Asai, Atsushi  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Okita, Taketoshi  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t Bioethics  |d Oxford [u.a.] : Wiley-Blackwell, 1987  |g 35(2021), 1, Seite 40-46  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)271596708  |w (DE-600)1480658-7  |w (DE-576)078707986  |x 1467-8519  |7 nnns 
773 1 8 |g volume:35  |g year:2021  |g number:1  |g pages:40-46 
856 |u https://rss.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/am-pdf/10.1111/bioe.12779  |x unpaywall  |z Vermutlich kostenfreier Zugang  |h publisher [open (via crossref license, author manuscript)] 
856 4 0 |u https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/bioe.12779  |x Verlag 
856 |u https://doi.org/10.1111/bioe.12779  |x doi  |3 Volltext 
951 |a AR 
ELC |a 1 
ITA |a 1  |t 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 3834923702 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1744585016 
LOK |0 005 20211006150744 
LOK |0 008 210113||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-Tue135  |c DE-627  |d DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 935   |a ixzs  |a ixzo 
LOK |0 936ln  |0 1550736558  |a NCH 
LOK |0 936ln  |0 1550736965  |a ZC 
OAS |a 1 
ORI |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw 
REL |a 1 
SUB |a REL