O redukci a vylučování ve studiu mystiky = On reduction and exclusion in the study of mysticism

The article deals with the recent criticism of the so-called classical study of mysticism, undertaken by Katz, Hollenback and Penner. It attempts to show that the central point of the discussion is the problem of the ineducibility of mystical phenomena. Although Otto, Underhill, Stace and others hav...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Subtitles:On reduction and exclusion in the study of mysticism
Main Author: Vaněk, David (Author)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:Czech
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Drawer...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Published: Společnost [1998]
In: Religio
Year: 1998, Volume: 6, Issue: 1, Pages: [49]-60
Online Access: Volltext (kostenfrei)

MARC

LEADER 00000caa a22000002 4500
001 1744589216
003 DE-627
005 20220630101752.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 210113s1998 xx |||||o 00| ||cze c
024 7 |a 11222.digilib/124828  |2 hdl 
035 |a (DE-627)1744589216 
035 |a (DE-599)KXP1744589216 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a cze 
084 |a 0  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |a Vaněk, David  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
245 1 0 |a O redukci a vylučování ve studiu mystiky  |b  = On reduction and exclusion in the study of mysticism 
246 3 1 |a On reduction and exclusion in the study of mysticism 
264 1 |c [1998] 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a The article deals with the recent criticism of the so-called classical study of mysticism, undertaken by Katz, Hollenback and Penner. It attempts to show that the central point of the discussion is the problem of the ineducibility of mystical phenomena. Although Otto, Underhill, Stace and others have been criticized for excluding the mystical from the rest of the reality, attributing to it some unique ontological and epistemological nature, their critics proved themselves unable to venture the real reduction. Their relation to it remains ambivalent: on the one hand, they are critical of the classics' quest for a totally exclusive experience, on the other hand, they employ various strategies to preserve exclusivity on the level of the particular cultural and historical context, defending the mystics against "essentialistic reductionism" and ethnocentrism. Such an attempt entails, however, another ethnocentric (or scientistic) statement: epistemological and ontological reflection has to be of no value for the mystics' view of their own experience. Mysticism may be unique because it has no concem with philosophy. Instead of such an ambivalence in relation to the philosophical reduction, the author of the article proposes to take both philosophy and the mystics' account of their experience seriously and confront each other as strongly as possible, disregarding possible accusations of the scientistic and cultural violence. 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t Religio  |d Brno : Společnost, 1993  |g 6(1998), 1, Seite [49]-60  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)728517531  |w (DE-600)2687025-3  |w (DE-576)401035689  |x 2336-4475  |7 nnns 
773 1 8 |g volume:6  |g year:1998  |g number:1  |g pages:[49]-60 
856 4 0 |u https://digilib.phil.muni.cz/handle/11222.digilib/124828  |x Verlag  |z kostenfrei 
951 |a AR 
ELC |a 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 3834940232 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1744589216 
LOK |0 005 20210113173649 
LOK |0 008 210113||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-Tue135  |c DE-627  |d DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 935   |a ixzs  |a ixzo  |a rwrk 
OAS |a 1 
ORI |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw 
REL |a 1 
SUB |a REL