Supernatural agents and prosociality in historical China: micro-modeling the cultural evolution of gods and morality in textual corpora

A major source of attention paid to high gods in the fields of cultural evolution and cognitive science is the social effects of belief in high gods. Belief in high gods is both hypothesized to catalyze a cognitive punishment-avoidance mechanism at the level of individual minds, and a group cultural...

Description complète

Enregistré dans:  
Détails bibliographiques
Publié dans:Religion, brain & behavior
Auteurs: Nichols, Ryan (Auteur) ; Slingerland, Edward G. 1968- (Auteur) ; Kirby, Peter (Auteur) ; Logan, Carson (Auteur) ; Nielbo, Kristoffer Laigaard (Auteur)
Type de support: Électronique Article
Langue:Anglais
Vérifier la disponibilité: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
En cours de chargement...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Publié: Routledge [2021]
Dans: Religion, brain & behavior
Année: 2021, Volume: 11, Numéro: 1, Pages: 46-64
Sujets / Chaînes de mots-clés standardisés:B China / Être surnaturel / Comportement prosocial / Être suprême / Corpus (Linguistique) / Exploration de données
RelBib Classification:AB Philosophie de la religion
KBM Asie
NBC Dieu
Sujets non-standardisés:B Exploration de données
B Cultural Evolution
B China
B Gods
B corpus linguistics
B cognitive science of religion
B Ancestors
Accès en ligne: Volltext (Resolving-System)
Description
Résumé:A major source of attention paid to high gods in the fields of cultural evolution and cognitive science is the social effects of belief in high gods. Belief in high gods is both hypothesized to catalyze a cognitive punishment-avoidance mechanism at the level of individual minds, and a group cultural evolutionary mechanism that amplifies in-group cooperation. Recent research into non-Western contexts not only indicates a multiplicity of supernatural influences on the individual-level and group-level mechanisms but raises questions about theoretical presuppositions about how a supernatural agent is classified as a high god or as something else. Our exploratory study operationalizes the question “Does historical China have high gods?” through the assessment of semantic associations between each of several supernatural agent categories (alleged high gods, low gods, ancestors, sage kings, and emperors) and each of several social functional content categories (punishment, reward, morality, monitoring, and religion). Analyzing collocations in a corpus of 5.7 m Chinese characters, representing all of the most influential historical Chinese-language texts, our preliminary results suggest social functions of supernatural agents in historical China were widely distributed across many species of supernatural agent thereby complicating a claim that high gods constitute a special category in relation to these social functions.
ISSN:2153-5981
Contient:Enthalten in: Religion, brain & behavior
Persistent identifiers:DOI: 10.1080/2153599X.2020.1742778