Analysis and evolution of European Case Law on conscientious objections in healthcare: Grimmark v. Sweden and Steen v. Sweden
Abstract Conscientious objection is a fundamental right recognized in various national and international texts and is generally linked to the religious beliefs of the people who invoke it. In this article, an analysis is made of the content of this fundamental right at the level of comparative and E...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Electronic Article |
| Language: | English |
| Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Drawer...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Published: |
Brill, Nijhoff
2020
|
| In: |
Religion and human rights
Year: 2020, Volume: 15, Issue: 3, Pages: 256-274 |
| RelBib Classification: | AD Sociology of religion; religious policy KBE Northern Europe; Scandinavia XA Law ZA Social sciences ZC Politics in general |
| Further subjects: | B
Religious Beliefs
B margin of appreciation B Conscientious Objection B Fundamental Rights |
| Online Access: |
Volltext (Resolving-System) |
MARC
| LEADER | 00000caa a2200000 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | 174779449X | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20220223110405.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 210209s2020 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1163/18710328-BJA10012 |2 doi | |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)174779449X | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)KXP174779449X | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rda | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 084 | |a 0 |2 ssgn | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Mengual, Jorge Salinas |e VerfasserIn |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Analysis and evolution of European Case Law on conscientious objections in healthcare: Grimmark v. Sweden and Steen v. Sweden |
| 264 | 1 | |c 2020 | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 520 | |a Abstract Conscientious objection is a fundamental right recognized in various national and international texts and is generally linked to the religious beliefs of the people who invoke it. In this article, an analysis is made of the content of this fundamental right at the level of comparative and European human right law, as well as a study of how it has evolved over the years in the judgments issued by the European Court of Human Rights. An analysis of the decisions in Grimmark v. Sweden and Steen v. Sweden particularly, allow us to establish a change of trend in the European jurisprudence that shifts from more Europeanist positions to other more national ones, based on the notion of the margin of appreciation. | ||
| 601 | |a Case law | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a Religious Beliefs | |
| 650 | 4 | |a margin of appreciation | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Fundamental Rights | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Conscientious Objection | |
| 652 | |a AD:KBE:XA:ZA:ZC | ||
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Religion and human rights |d Leiden : Brill, Nijhoff, 2006 |g 15(2020), 3, Seite 256-274 |h Online-Ressource |w (DE-627)518818446 |w (DE-600)2254876-2 |w (DE-576)321221702 |x 1871-0328 |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:15 |g year:2020 |g number:3 |g pages:256-274 |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.1163/18710328-BJA10012 |x Resolving-System |
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| ELC | |a 1 | ||
| ITA | |a 1 |t 1 | ||
| LOK | |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 | ||
| LOK | |0 001 3850006603 | ||
| LOK | |0 003 DE-627 | ||
| LOK | |0 004 174779449X | ||
| LOK | |0 005 20220223110405 | ||
| LOK | |0 008 210209||||||||||||||||ger||||||| | ||
| LOK | |0 035 |a (DE-Tue135)IxTheo#2021-02-08#BC251941A0E25119B120849C5DCDC77F11DD3F17 | ||
| LOK | |0 040 |a DE-Tue135 |c DE-627 |d DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 092 |o n | ||
| LOK | |0 852 |a DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 852 1 |9 00 | ||
| LOK | |0 935 |a ixzs |a zota | ||
| LOK | |0 936ln |0 1442044780 |a KBE | ||
| LOK | |0 936ln |0 1442053771 |a ZA | ||
| LOK | |0 936ln |0 1550736965 |a ZC | ||
| LOK | |0 936ln |0 1442053798 |a XA | ||
| LOK | |0 936ln |0 1442043016 |a AD | ||
| ORI | |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw | ||
| REL | |a 1 | ||
| SUB | |a REL | ||