Between the Two Ethics: Why Assessor Wilhelm is not a Judge
Although there is a broad agreement among Kierkegaard’s scholars that Assessor Wilhelm is an ethical thinker, the agreement on what kind of ethics his standpoint represents has been much harder to come by. The suggestions range from Schiller to Aristotle and from Kant to Hegel. The article contends...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Electronic Article |
| Language: | English |
| Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Drawer...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Published: |
De Gruyter
[2020]
|
| In: |
Kierkegaard studies. Yearbook
Year: 2020, Volume: 25, Issue: 1, Pages: 15-26 |
| RelBib Classification: | NCA Ethics TJ Modern history VA Philosophy |
| Online Access: |
Volltext (Verlag) Volltext (doi) |
MARC
| LEADER | 00000caa a22000002 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | 1749191660 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20210618162153.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 210223s2020 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1515/kierke-2020-0002 |2 doi | |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)1749191660 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)KXP1749191660 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rda | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 084 | |a 1 |2 ssgn | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Bachmetjevas, Viktoras |e VerfasserIn |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Between the Two Ethics |b Why Assessor Wilhelm is not a Judge |
| 264 | 1 | |c [2020] | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 520 | |a Although there is a broad agreement among Kierkegaard’s scholars that Assessor Wilhelm is an ethical thinker, the agreement on what kind of ethics his standpoint represents has been much harder to come by. The suggestions range from Schiller to Aristotle and from Kant to Hegel. The article contends that the apparent lack of a coherent ethical theory on Assessor Wilhelm’s part is in fact part of a deliberate ethical strategy. Based on Vigilius Haufniensis’ distinction between first and second ethics, it is argued that Assessor Wilhelm occupies a space in between, in which he attempts to create a dynamic for A in the direction of the so-called second ethics, and this by mainly using ironic means. | ||
| 601 | |a Wilhelm | ||
| 652 | |a NCA:TJ:VA | ||
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Kierkegaard studies. Yearbook |d Berlin [u.a.] : De Gruyter, 1996 |g 25(2020), 1, Seite 15-26 |h Online-Ressource |w (DE-627)369083393 |w (DE-600)2118444-6 |w (DE-576)107015773 |x 1612-9792 |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:25 |g year:2020 |g number:1 |g pages:15-26 |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.1515/kierke-2020-0002/html |x Verlag |
| 856 | |u https://doi.org/10.1515/kierke-2020-0002 |x doi |3 Volltext | ||
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| ELC | |a 1 | ||
| ITA | |a 1 |t 1 | ||
| LOK | |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 | ||
| LOK | |0 001 3870906928 | ||
| LOK | |0 003 DE-627 | ||
| LOK | |0 004 1749191660 | ||
| LOK | |0 005 20210830124551 | ||
| LOK | |0 008 210223||||||||||||||||ger||||||| | ||
| LOK | |0 040 |a DE-Tue135 |c DE-627 |d DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 092 |o n | ||
| LOK | |0 852 |a DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 852 1 |9 00 | ||
| LOK | |0 935 |a ixzs |a ixzo | ||
| LOK | |0 936ln |0 1442053844 |a VA | ||
| LOK | |0 936ln |0 1442053909 |a TJ | ||
| LOK | |0 936ln |0 1442052465 |a NCA | ||
| ORI | |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw | ||
| REL | |a 1 | ||
| SUB | |a REL | ||