Between the Two Ethics: Why Assessor Wilhelm is not a Judge
Although there is a broad agreement among Kierkegaard’s scholars that Assessor Wilhelm is an ethical thinker, the agreement on what kind of ethics his standpoint represents has been much harder to come by. The suggestions range from Schiller to Aristotle and from Kant to Hegel. The article contends...
| 1. VerfasserIn: | |
|---|---|
| Medienart: | Elektronisch Aufsatz |
| Sprache: | Englisch |
| Verfügbarkeit prüfen: | HBZ Gateway |
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Veröffentlicht: |
[2020]
|
| In: |
Kierkegaard studies. Yearbook
Jahr: 2020, Band: 25, Heft: 1, Seiten: 15-26 |
| RelBib Classification: | NCA Ethik TJ Neuzeit VA Philosophie |
| Online-Zugang: |
Volltext (Verlag) Volltext (doi) |
| Zusammenfassung: | Although there is a broad agreement among Kierkegaard’s scholars that Assessor Wilhelm is an ethical thinker, the agreement on what kind of ethics his standpoint represents has been much harder to come by. The suggestions range from Schiller to Aristotle and from Kant to Hegel. The article contends that the apparent lack of a coherent ethical theory on Assessor Wilhelm’s part is in fact part of a deliberate ethical strategy. Based on Vigilius Haufniensis’ distinction between first and second ethics, it is argued that Assessor Wilhelm occupies a space in between, in which he attempts to create a dynamic for A in the direction of the so-called second ethics, and this by mainly using ironic means. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 1612-9792 |
| Enthält: | Enthalten in: Kierkegaard studies. Yearbook
|
| Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1515/kierke-2020-0002 |
