Social sin, social redemption

Eleonore Stump's Atonement marks a significant advance in atonement theory, especially in its nuanced approach to ethical and relational complexities, but tends to treat sin as social only insofar as one individual's sin can harm or shame another. I argue that that social sin requires soci...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:  
Bibliographische Detailangaben
1. VerfasserIn: Pogin, Kathryn ca. 20./21. Jh. (VerfasserIn)
Medienart: Elektronisch Aufsatz
Sprache:Englisch
Verfügbarkeit prüfen: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Lade...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Veröffentlicht: Cambridge Univ. Press [2021]
In: Religious studies
Jahr: 2021, Band: 57, Heft: 1, Seiten: 157-164
normierte Schlagwort(-folgen):B Stump, Eleonore 1947-, Atonement / Jesus Christus / Sündenvergebung / Sühne / Sozialethik
RelBib Classification:NBE Anthropologie
NBF Christologie
NBK Soteriologie
NCC Sozialethik
Online Zugang: Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Eleonore Stump's Atonement marks a significant advance in atonement theory, especially in its nuanced approach to ethical and relational complexities, but tends to treat sin as social only insofar as one individual's sin can harm or shame another. I argue that that social sin requires social redemption and that exemplarism would provide a solution. Christ's pursuit of love and justice, in the midst of oppression, temptation, and struggle, offers a distinctive model of virtue, towards collective restoration of the world. While we cannot redeem ourselves, in calling us to effect justice and union with one another, God may also call us closer to Godself.
ISSN:1469-901X
Bezug:Kritik von "Atonement (2021)"
Kritik in "Atonement (2021)"
Enthält:Enthalten in: Religious studies
Persistent identifiers:DOI: 10.1017/S0034412519000581