Social sin, social redemption
Eleonore Stump's Atonement marks a significant advance in atonement theory, especially in its nuanced approach to ethical and relational complexities, but tends to treat sin as social only insofar as one individual's sin can harm or shame another. I argue that that social sin requires soci...
| Auteur principal: | |
|---|---|
| Type de support: | Électronique Article |
| Langue: | Anglais |
| Vérifier la disponibilité: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | En cours de chargement...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Publié: |
Cambridge Univ. Press
[2021]
|
| Dans: |
Religious studies
Année: 2021, Volume: 57, Numéro: 1, Pages: 157-164 |
| Sujets / Chaînes de mots-clés standardisés: | B
Stump, Eleonore 1947-, Atonement
/ Jesus Christus
/ Rémission des péchés
/ Expiation
/ Éthique sociale
|
| RelBib Classification: | NBE Anthropologie NBF Christologie NBK Sotériologie NCC Éthique sociale |
| Accès en ligne: |
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
| Résumé: | Eleonore Stump's Atonement marks a significant advance in atonement theory, especially in its nuanced approach to ethical and relational complexities, but tends to treat sin as social only insofar as one individual's sin can harm or shame another. I argue that that social sin requires social redemption and that exemplarism would provide a solution. Christ's pursuit of love and justice, in the midst of oppression, temptation, and struggle, offers a distinctive model of virtue, towards collective restoration of the world. While we cannot redeem ourselves, in calling us to effect justice and union with one another, God may also call us closer to Godself. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 1469-901X |
| Référence: | Kritik von "Atonement (2021)"
Kritik in "Atonement (2021)" |
| Contient: | Enthalten in: Religious studies
|
| Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1017/S0034412519000581 |