Sünde und Selbsttäuschung?: Von Tücke, Trotz und anderen epistemischen Widrigkeiten
My article is critical of current attempts to find a technical category of „self-deception“ in a wide range of hamartiological reflections such as those of Kant, Pascal, Kierkegaard or Augustine, and it pleads for handling the category with care. For this I take two steps. First, I show that the int...
| 1. VerfasserIn: | |
|---|---|
| Medienart: | Elektronisch Aufsatz |
| Sprache: | Deutsch |
| Verfügbarkeit prüfen: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Lade...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Veröffentlicht: |
Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht
[2021]
|
| In: |
Kerygma und Dogma
Jahr: 2021, Band: 67, Heft: 1, Seiten: 3-29 |
| normierte Schlagwort(-folgen): | B
Dyke, Daniel -1614
/ Augustinus, Aurelius, Heiliger 354-430
/ Sünde
/ Selbsttäuschung
|
| RelBib Classification: | CB Christliche Existenz; Spiritualität NBE Anthropologie VA Philosophie |
| Online Zugang: |
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
| Zusammenfassung: | My article is critical of current attempts to find a technical category of „self-deception“ in a wide range of hamartiological reflections such as those of Kant, Pascal, Kierkegaard or Augustine, and it pleads for handling the category with care. For this I take two steps. First, I show that the introduction of a technical category of „self-deception“ (or „self-deceit“) drew on quite specific and deeply problematic theoretical premises and did not even aim to be phenomenologically particularly apt. In a second step, I focus on Augustine in order to show that current attempts to identify a central notion of „self-deception“ in his work are problematic and that, at least in his case, our category conceals more than it illuminates. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 2196-8020 |
| Enthält: | Enthalten in: Kerygma und Dogma
|
| Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.13109/kedo.2021.67.1.3 |