Sünde und Selbsttäuschung?: Von Tücke, Trotz und anderen epistemischen Widrigkeiten
My article is critical of current attempts to find a technical category of „self-deception“ in a wide range of hamartiological reflections such as those of Kant, Pascal, Kierkegaard or Augustine, and it pleads for handling the category with care. For this I take two steps. First, I show that the int...
| Auteur principal: | |
|---|---|
| Type de support: | Électronique Article |
| Langue: | Allemand |
| Vérifier la disponibilité: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | En cours de chargement...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Publié: |
Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht
[2021]
|
| Dans: |
Kerygma und Dogma
Année: 2021, Volume: 67, Numéro: 1, Pages: 3-29 |
| Sujets / Chaînes de mots-clés standardisés: | B
Dyke, Daniel -1614
/ Augustinus, Aurelius, Saint 354-430
/ Péché
/ Aveuglement
|
| RelBib Classification: | CB Spiritualité chrétienne NBE Anthropologie VA Philosophie |
| Accès en ligne: |
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
| Résumé: | My article is critical of current attempts to find a technical category of „self-deception“ in a wide range of hamartiological reflections such as those of Kant, Pascal, Kierkegaard or Augustine, and it pleads for handling the category with care. For this I take two steps. First, I show that the introduction of a technical category of „self-deception“ (or „self-deceit“) drew on quite specific and deeply problematic theoretical premises and did not even aim to be phenomenologically particularly apt. In a second step, I focus on Augustine in order to show that current attempts to identify a central notion of „self-deception“ in his work are problematic and that, at least in his case, our category conceals more than it illuminates. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 2196-8020 |
| Contient: | Enthalten in: Kerygma und Dogma
|
| Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.13109/kedo.2021.67.1.3 |