The Joshua Generation: Conquest and the Promised Land

I set out to read the book of Joshua together with its most literal interpreters - those who enacted a version of the war for the Promised Land - and suggest that interpretations of the book are always bound up with current ideas about war and territorial rights. In particular, I analyze how David B...

Description complète

Enregistré dans:  
Détails bibliographiques
Publié dans:Critical research on religion
Auteur principal: Havrelock, Rachel S. 1952- (Auteur)
Type de support: Électronique Article
Langue:Anglais
Vérifier la disponibilité: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
En cours de chargement...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Publié: Sage [2013]
Dans: Critical research on religion
Sujets non-standardisés:B Occupation
B Regionalism
B national myth
B history of interpretation
B David Ben-Gurion
B book of Joshua
Accès en ligne: Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Description
Résumé:I set out to read the book of Joshua together with its most literal interpreters - those who enacted a version of the war for the Promised Land - and suggest that interpretations of the book are always bound up with current ideas about war and territorial rights. In particular, I analyze how David Ben-Gurion, the first Prime Minister of Israel, and his Bible study group parsed the book of Joshua and argue that their interpretations, like the book of Joshua itself, represent projections of nationalist desire onto a varied, multifarious social setting. Joshua’s conquest and Israel’s founding narrative both involve military narratives generated in order to obscure the presence of non-nationals. In the next stage of the argument, I suggest that the story of the conquest itself attests to the very fluid social setting that it aims to overcome. Just as Ben-Gurion appealed to Joshua as precedent and the contemporary State of Israel looks to Ben-Gurion as a model, post-nationalists can locate a paradigm in the selfsame founding myths.
ISSN:2050-3040
Contient:Enthalten in: Critical research on religion
Persistent identifiers:DOI: 10.1177/2050303213506473