From Ousia to Sophia: The Patristic and Classical Background to Twentieth-Century Essentialism and Personalism
Both Classical Greek philosophy and the early Christian theology that often drew upon it reflected a tension in their understanding of essence (οὐσία). Was it a concrete thing, something that could assume agency and be related to, or did it refer only to the shared characteristics that reflect thing...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Electronic Article |
Language: | English |
Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
Journals Online & Print: | |
Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
Published: |
Wiley-Blackwell
[2021]
|
In: |
International journal of systematic theology
Year: 2021, Volume: 23, Issue: 1, Pages: 57-67 |
RelBib Classification: | KAB Church history 30-500; early Christianity KAH Church history 1648-1913; modern history KDF Orthodox Church NBF Christology TB Antiquity VA Philosophy |
Online Access: |
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
Summary: | Both Classical Greek philosophy and the early Christian theology that often drew upon it reflected a tension in their understanding of essence (οὐσία). Was it a concrete thing, something that could assume agency and be related to, or did it refer only to the shared characteristics that reflect things and persons of a common kind? In this article I first establish that this question pertains, mutatis mutandis, to the Platonic forms, as well as to Christian concepts of essence and nature. I then argue that the Christian theology of the conciliar period sided against the reification of essence/nature, noting that their misplaced concreteness resulted in problematic doctrines. In conclusion I briefly explore how this same dynamic plays out in twentieth-century Orthodox theology, as expressed by Sergius Bulgakov, Vladimir Lossky and John Zizioulas. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1468-2400 |
Contains: | Enthalten in: International journal of systematic theology
|
Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1111/ijst.12457 |